Mohammad T Islam (BSc, MBA, MEd)

Controlling Screen Addiction in Children: Strategies for Healthy Media Habits

by

With the increasing accessibility of digital devices such as smartphones, tablets, and television, children are engaging with screens more frequently than ever before. While technology offers educational and entertainment benefits, excessive screen addiction can have detrimental effects on a child’s physical health, emotional regulation, cognitive development, and social interactions (American Academy of Paediatrics, 2016; Keikha et al., 2024). This article provides an evidence-based overview of strategies to reduce screen addiction in children. Drawing on textbook theories, academic research, and guidelines from reputable health organisations, these strategies focus on setting boundaries, promoting alternative activities, and developing healthy digital habits. 1.0 Set Screen Time Limits Setting appropriate limits on daily screen use is vital to maintaining a healthy balance between screen-based and offline activities. Excessive screen use is linked to issues such as reduced attention, poor sleep quality, and delayed academic skills (Domoff et al., 2019). According to the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) (2019), consistent rules and open conversations about screen time contribute to better outcomes. Tools such as parental control apps can help enforce boundaries and create accountability. Tip: Establish a clear daily or weekly screen time budget, and stick to it using visual timers or app-based monitoring tools. 2.0 Create Tech-Free Zones Designating specific areas of the home—such as bedrooms, dining areas, and study corners—as screen-free zones reduces the temptation to use devices and promotes better sleep and communication (Robinson, 2021). Keeping screens out of sleep environments helps protect circadian rhythms and improve overall wellbeing. Tip: Encourage the whole family to follow tech-free rules in designated areas, leading by example and creating consistency. 3.0 Encourage Balanced Activities Children are more likely to reduce screen use when engaging alternatives are readily available. Activities such as reading, drawing, outdoor play, music, and board games can fulfil their need for entertainment and stimulation (Straker et al., 2017). Keikha et al. (2024) note that increasing access to diverse, stimulating non-digital experiences significantly reduces screen dependency across various age groups. Tip: Rotate and refresh offline activity options regularly to prevent boredom and foster creativity. 4.0 Be a Role Model Parental behaviour plays a key role in shaping children’s media habits. Children are more likely to manage their screen use effectively when they observe their caregivers engaging in offline hobbies, meaningful conversations, and screen-free moments (Hiniker et al., 2016). Tip: Avoid checking devices during meals, conversations, or family time. Demonstrate your own boundaries with screen use. 5.0 Establish Screen-Free Times Creating device-free routines—such as during meals, before bedtime, or while engaging in shared family activities—promotes meaningful interactions and supports healthy development. Excessive evening screen use has been shown to delay sleep onset and impact melatonin levels (Gentile et al., 2014). Tip: Implement a “no screens after dinner” policy or create a family media schedule that allows for structured screen breaks. 6.0 Monitor Content Carefully It is not only the amount of screen time that matters but also the type of content being consumed. Exposure to violent, commercialised, or age-inappropriate material has been linked to behavioural problems, emotional distress, and unhealthy attitudes (Livingstone et al., 2017). Tip: Choose educational or age-appropriate platforms, use filters, and engage in co-viewing to better understand and discuss what your child is watching or playing. 7.0 Promote Active and Educational Screen Use Not all screen time is passive. Educational apps and interactive games that involve physical movement, problem-solving, or creative thinking are more beneficial than passive consumption. Active screen use can promote language development, executive function, and fine motor skills (Straker et al., 2017). Tip: Encourage digital tools that require interaction, and always be present to guide the experience and reinforce learning. 8.0 Reward Positive Behaviour Positive reinforcement can be a powerful motivator. Children who are praised or rewarded for choosing non-screen activities or following digital limits are more likely to internalise those behaviours (Hollis et al., 2016). Tip: Use charts, tokens, or verbal praise to recognise screen-free choices and follow through with enjoyable offline rewards such as special outings or family time. 9.0 Maintain Open Communication Rather than dictating screen rules, involve children in conversations about why balance is important. Explaining the benefits of limiting screen use—such as improved energy, better relationships, and more fun—helps children feel included and respected (Palladino, 2015). Tip: Ask open-ended questions like “What was your favourite part of today that didn’t involve a screen?” to spark discussion and reflection. 10.0 Seek Professional Guidance When Needed If screen use is interfering with your child’s behaviour, sleep, or emotional wellbeing, it may be time to consult a professional. The Problematic Media Use Measure (PMUM) developed by Domoff et al. (2019) can help identify signs of screen addiction, including withdrawal, tantrums, and loss of interest in other activities. Tip: Speak with a paediatrician, school counsellor, or child psychologist if concerns persist despite efforts to manage screen habits. The Role of Parenting Programmes and Community Support Evidence-based programmes like Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) and BePresent offer guidance and support for families navigating digital media use. These initiatives have shown positive outcomes in managing screen-related behaviours and enhancing family communication (Baumel et al., 2025). Community campaigns and screen-free challenges can further reinforce positive behaviour and create supportive peer environments for children and parents alike (Keikha et al., 2024). Managing screen use in children requires a thoughtful, consistent approach that involves clear limits, engaging alternatives, and strong communication. Rather than eliminating screens altogether, the goal is to cultivate a balanced media diet that supports children’s mental health, relationships, and learning. When used intentionally, technology can become a tool for growth, not a barrier to it. The key lies in setting the right tone at home—where screens are just one part of a rich and varied daily experience. References American Academy of Paediatrics (2016). Media and Young Minds. Paediatrics, 138(5), pp. 25–91. Baumel, A., Mishina, K., Kinnunen, M., & Ristkari, T. (2025). BePresent universal internet-based parenting intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27(1), e65391. https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e65391/ Domoff, S.E. et al. (2019). Development and validation of the Problematic Media Use … Read more

Communication Skills: Key to Achieving Leadership Success

by

Communication skills are at the heart of effective leadership, acting as the foundation upon which trust, collaboration, and organisational success are built. In contemporary organisations, leaders are constantly required to inspire, motivate, and guide their teams through complex challenges and changing environments. Research consistently shows that communication effectiveness is one of the strongest predictors of leadership success, influencing everything from employee engagement to overall performance outcomes (Robbins & Judge, 2018). This article explores the crucial role of communication in leadership, focusing on five interlinked dimensions: clarity in articulating vision, active listening and open dialogue, constructive feedback, transparency and authenticity, and conflict resolution. Each dimension illustrates how leaders can harness communication as a powerful tool to empower teams, strengthen culture, and achieve strategic goals. 1.0 Clarity in Articulating Vision and Goals One of the primary responsibilities of a leader is to articulate vision and goals with clarity. Without clear communication, even the most innovative strategies can falter. Taylor (2021) argues that leaders who express their goals persuasively create a sense of direction and purpose, inspiring team members to align their work with organisational objectives. For instance, Steve Jobs was renowned for communicating Apple’s vision of “putting a dent in the universe” with simplicity and passion, motivating employees to strive for innovation. According to Northouse (2018), clarity in vision not only enhances motivation but also reduces ambiguity, allowing employees to prioritise their efforts effectively. Practical techniques for ensuring clarity include using plain language, aligning messages with values, and reinforcing key messages through multiple communication channels. In large organisations, leaders often use town halls, newsletters, and digital platforms to ensure consistency in communication (Daft, 2015). 2.0 Active Listening and Open Dialogue Active listening is central to leadership communication. Leaders who merely transmit information without listening fail to engage with their teams meaningfully. According to Robinson et al. (2018), active listening involves more than hearing words; it requires demonstrating empathy, asking probing questions, and creating space for open dialogue. Open dialogue fosters psychological safety, enabling team members to share concerns, ideas, and innovative solutions without fear of reprisal (Edmondson, 1999). For example, Google’s Project Aristotle identified open communication and listening as essential to high-performing teams, demonstrating how dialogue drives collaboration and innovation (Rozovsky, 2015). Leaders can practise active listening by using techniques such as paraphrasing, nodding, and providing verbal acknowledgements. These small but significant cues reassure employees that their perspectives are valued, thus strengthening trust and engagement. 3.0 Constructive Feedback Strategies Providing constructive feedback is one of the most challenging but essential aspects of leadership communication. Poorly delivered feedback can demoralise employees, while well-structured feedback can motivate growth and improve performance. Clark and Turner (2018) emphasise that effective feedback is specific, timely, and balanced—highlighting strengths while identifying areas for improvement. For example, instead of saying, “Your report was inadequate,” a constructive leader might state, “The report was well-structured, but adding more data analysis would strengthen your argument.” Organisations such as Adobe have adopted a “check-in culture,” replacing annual reviews with ongoing feedback sessions. This model demonstrates how frequent, constructive feedback enhances employee development and reduces turnover (Cappelli & Tavis, 2016). Moreover, effective feedback reinforces a culture of continuous learning, where mistakes are seen as opportunities for growth rather than failures. 4.0 Transparency and Authenticity Transparency and authenticity in communication are vital for building trust between leaders and teams. Leaders who conceal information or appear inauthentic risk eroding credibility and fostering suspicion. According to Brown and Wilson (2019), authenticity is about aligning words with actions, while transparency ensures that employees remain informed and engaged. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders who communicated openly about organisational challenges—such as revenue losses or job risks—were more successful in maintaining employee trust compared to those who withheld information (Harvard Business Review, 2020). Authentic leaders also show vulnerability, admitting when they do not have all the answers. Avolio and Gardner (2005) define this as authentic leadership, where openness fosters loyalty and commitment. Such communication creates an atmosphere of mutual respect, where leaders and employees work together towards shared objectives. 5.0 Conflict Resolution through Communication Conflict is inevitable in any organisation, but the way leaders handle it determines whether outcomes are destructive or constructive. Davis (2020) argues that communication is the most effective tool for conflict resolution, enabling leaders to mediate disputes, facilitate dialogue, and guide teams towards mutually beneficial solutions. An effective leader refrains from avoiding conflict, instead addressing it proactively through open conversations and structured dialogue. Techniques such as interest-based negotiation and active mediation are particularly effective in aligning divergent perspectives. For example, Satya Nadella at Microsoft has been praised for transforming internal rivalries into collaborative opportunities by fostering open dialogue and encouraging empathy-driven communication (Microsoft, 2019). This has significantly improved innovation and team cohesion within the organisation. The role of communication skills in leadership cannot be overstated. From clarity in articulating vision to active listening, constructive feedback, transparency, and conflict resolution, communication is both the foundation and the driving force behind effective leadership. Leaders who master communication build trust, enhance collaboration, and foster innovation, while poor communication breeds confusion, disengagement, and mistrust. As businesses face increasingly complex challenges, leaders must continue to refine their communication strategies to remain effective. Ultimately, the ability to communicate with clarity, authenticity, and empathy transforms leaders from mere managers into inspirational figures, guiding their organisations toward sustainable success. References Avolio, B.J. & Gardner, W.L. (2005) ‘Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership’, The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), pp. 315–338. Brown, P. & Wilson, G. (2019) Trust and Authenticity in Leadership. London: Routledge. Cappelli, P. & Tavis, A. (2016) ‘The performance management revolution’, Harvard Business Review, 94(10), pp. 58–67. Clark, E. & Turner, S. (2018) ‘Inspiring greatness: The role of inspirational leadership in motivating teams’, Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), pp. 123–137. Daft, R.L. (2015) The Leadership Experience. 6th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning. Davis, R. (2020) ‘Resolving conflicts in the workplace: Strategies for effective conflict resolution’, Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 45(3), pp. 321–335. Edmondson, A. (1999) ‘Psychological safety and learning … Read more

Verbal Communication: The Power of Words

by

The Power of Words: Influence, Persuasion, and Responsibility Words are more than tools of verbal communication; they hold immense power to influence, persuade, and shape lives. They can uplift, inspire, and empower—or wound, divide, and mislead. From personal experience, I have seen how words can convince others to adopt beliefs, even when those beliefs are false. Once, in a casual conversation, I fabricated a story claiming that eating chocolate was more harmful than smoking. Shockingly, several friends believed me, and two even began smoking as a result. This revealed to me that the power of words, when used carelessly or dishonestly, can have life-altering consequences. This article explores the influence of words on behaviour, the psychology behind language, their role in social and environmental change, their use as weapons or tools of healing, and finally, the ethical responsibility that comes with wielding such influence. 1.0 The Influence of Words on Behaviour Language is one of the most powerful elements of human interaction. Our words shape perceptions of the world, define relationships, and influence behaviours. As I experienced when misleading friends, words delivered persuasively—even when false—can override rational thought. Persuasion is a form of social influence guiding thought and action (Gass & Seiter, 2017). How a message is delivered determines whether it builds trust or erodes it. In my case, persuasive but false communication caused harm, reminding me that every speaker carries responsibility for their words. Example: In marketing, companies often use carefully crafted words to influence consumer decisions. However, misleading advertising can damage both consumer trust and brand reputation, illustrating the double-edged nature of persuasive communication. 2.0 The Psychology Behind Words Words trigger cognitive and emotional responses. I witnessed this with my young son. Frustrated with his habit of scribbling on walls, I snapped, “Are you stupid? Don’t ever do that again!” He defied me and repeated the behaviour. Later, when I spoke calmly—“Sweetie, don’t do that. You’re a big boy now”—he stopped. This contrast demonstrates how positive communication is more effective than harsh words. Bandura’s (1977) social learning theory shows that people internalise behaviours through observing how authority figures communicate. Harsh words provoke resistance, while calm, respectful speech fosters compliance. Example: In classrooms, teachers who encourage students with affirming words create stronger engagement and cooperation than those who rely on criticism. Gottman (2015) similarly stresses that relationships thrive on positive reinforcement, not negativity. 3.0 Words in Social and Environmental Change Beyond personal interactions, words shape public discourse on global challenges. One area where this is evident is climate change communication. Despite the urgency of the crisis, many remain indifferent, partly because messages are presented in overly technical ways. Nisbet (2009) argues that scientific communication often fails because it lacks emotional framing. People disengage when bombarded with jargon and graphs. Entman’s (1993) framing theory explains that the way information is presented—its “frame”—shapes interpretation. A message framed as “rising global temperatures” may seem abstract, but when reframed as “our children’s future is at risk,” it connects emotionally and motivates action. Example: Campaigns that highlight how climate change threatens daily life—such as food supply or children’s health—are more successful in mobilising communities than those that rely solely on scientific data. 4.0 Words as Weapons or Tools of Healing Words can harm as much as they heal. A personal example is the tragic story of my friend Jonathan. He idolised his father, but when he shared news of academic success, his father dismissed him with a cold, “I’m busy.” That careless phrase devastated him, contributing to years of self-destructive behaviour. Research confirms this reality: children who experience verbal rejection or neglect are more likely to suffer low self-esteem, depression, and destructive behaviours (Rohner & Britner, 2002). Jonathan’s story illustrates how words, or their absence, can shape a life’s trajectory. Yet words can also heal. When I changed my approach with my son—using calm, affirming language—his behaviour improved. This aligns with Gottman’s (2015) findings that encouraging words strengthen relationships. Example: In healthcare, doctors who use empathetic communication not only reduce patient anxiety but also improve treatment adherence. Words of reassurance can literally aid healing. 5.0 The Ethical Responsibility of Using Words Because words wield such influence, their use carries profound ethical responsibility. As Rawlins (2006) argues, ethical communication demands honesty, transparency, and awareness of consequences. Whether as parents, professionals, or leaders, our words matter. Leaders in particular bear responsibility, as their words often shape collective beliefs and actions. Misleading or inflammatory speech can create division, while constructive and truthful language can inspire cooperation. Example: During public health crises, accurate and empathetic communication from leaders builds trust and compliance, whereas dismissive or contradictory words undermine public confidence and endanger lives. The responsibility extends to everyday life: a careless insult can fracture a friendship, while a kind word can restore it. Thus, choosing words mindfully is not only a personal virtue but a social duty. The power of words lies not only in their ability to convey information but in their capacity to influence thought, shape behaviour, and affect lives. They can act as weapons of destruction when used carelessly, as seen in Jonathan’s story, or as tools of healing, as demonstrated with my son. They can mislead entire groups, as my fabricated smoking story revealed, or mobilise societies, as effective climate change framing has shown. Ultimately, words are not neutral; they carry weight. As Gass and Seiter (2017) stress, persuasion is unavoidable in human interaction. With that influence comes responsibility. Whether in private conversations or public discourse, we must strive to use words ethically, positively, and thoughtfully—to build rather than break, to inspire rather than harm, and to guide others towards truth rather than deception. The proverb “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me” is misleading. Words do hurt—but they can also heal. Their true power lies in how we choose to wield them. References Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Entman, R.M. (1993). ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’. Journal of … Read more

Those Who Speak Rudely Cannot Sell Honey, Those Who Speak Nicely Can Sell Chilli

by

The proverb “Those who speak rudely cannot sell honey, those who speak nicely can sell chilli” captures the profound influence of communication style on success in human interaction. Honey represents something inherently desirable, while chilli symbolises something sharp or challenging. Yet the proverb reminds us that no matter how appealing a product or idea may be, poor communication can undermine it. Conversely, even difficult or unappealing propositions can be accepted if delivered with politeness, empathy, and respect. This article explores the meaning of the proverb by examining rude versus polite speech, and the broader role of communication style in personal relationships, business, leadership, and negotiations. 1.0 Honey: Symbol of Sweetness and Desirability Honey symbolises sweetness and attraction, both literally and metaphorically. Throughout history it has represented goodness, healing, and divine favour (Carroll, 2013). In modern markets it remains a premium product, valued for its natural sweetness. The proverb suggests that even honey can lose appeal if presented rudely. Communication acts as the medium through which inherent value is either amplified or diminished (Adler, Rosenfeld & Proctor, 2019). A rude seller of honey risks alienating customers, preventing them from recognising the product’s natural value. Example: A luxury goods retailer with superior products may still fail if sales staff communicate dismissively. Consumers increasingly link service experience with brand loyalty (Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry, 1985). 2.0 Rude Speech: Overshadowing Inherent Value Rudeness—abruptness, condescension, or insensitivity—creates barriers that overshadow even the best offerings. Mehrabian’s (1972) classic research shows that people often respond more strongly to tone and delivery than to content. A rude salesperson selling honey may drive customers away, despite product quality. Similarly, in leadership, dismissive communication can demotivate teams, undermining organisational goals. Goleman (1995) emphasises that emotional intelligence is key to managing relationships; rudeness erodes trust and goodwill, both vital for long-term success. 3.0 Chilli: Symbol of Sharpness and Challenge In contrast, chilli symbolises sharpness and difficulty. Its strong flavour divides opinion, much like controversial ideas or challenging tasks (Brillat-Savarin, 2009). Yet the proverb suggests that even chilli can be “sold” through polite and respectful communication. Example: A company promoting a new, unfamiliar technology may encounter scepticism. However, through empathetic communication—emphasising benefits, listening to concerns, and framing challenges positively—leaders can build acceptance. Thus, chilli becomes a metaphor for any difficult or less desirable proposition that can succeed when wrapped in kind communication. 4.0 Nice Speech: Enhancing Receptivity Politeness and empathy transform resistance into receptivity. Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory highlights how careful language fosters respect and cooperation. Covey (1989) further argues that effective communication is grounded in respect for others, creating conditions where people feel valued. Example: A skilled salesperson selling chilli may focus on its health benefits or culinary excitement, reframing perceptions. Rather than coercion, the seller uses positive and respectful communication, making customers open to considering the product (Brett, Behfar & Kern, 2007). 5.0 The Power of Communication Style The proverb underscores that style matters as much as substance. Thompson, Wang and Gunia (2021) argue that in negotiation and persuasion, delivery often determines outcomes. Warmth, politeness, and respectful tone shape perceptions more than factual content. Burgoon, Guerrero and Floyd (2016) support this with evidence that nonverbal and paralinguistic cues—such as tone, pitch, and friendliness—play a significant role in how messages are received. In short, how something is said often matters more than what is said. 6.0 Kindness Enhances Receptivity Kindness in communication creates openness, empathy, and willingness to engage. Rogers (1961) identified empathy as central to building authentic connections, while Bass (1990) showed that transformational leaders inspire greater performance by using encouragement and vision rather than criticism. Example: In workplaces, leaders who frame difficult feedback with kindness—acknowledging strengths while suggesting improvements—are more effective than those who rely on blunt criticism. Polite communication conveys respect, which in turn fosters trust and collaboration. 7.0 Rudeness Negates Value Conversely, rude speech negates value, no matter how inherently attractive the offering. Negative communication creates defensiveness and resistance (Mehrabian, 1972). Example: In negotiations, rude or aggressive behaviour often derails discussions, preventing agreement even when both sides would benefit (Fisher & Ury, 1981). Similarly, in customer service, poor communication overshadows even excellent products, leading to dissatisfaction and loss of loyalty. Thus, rudeness acts as a barrier, not just to selling products but also to sustaining relationships and opportunities. 8.0 Turning Challenges into Opportunities Perhaps the deepest wisdom in the proverb is that communication style transforms challenges into opportunities. Politeness, empathy, and tact can shift perception from resistance to curiosity, and from rejection to acceptance. Example: In diplomacy, tactful speech often defuses tension and opens space for cooperation, even in high-conflict situations. Carnegie (1936) long argued that winning people’s goodwill through kind speech is more powerful than forcing compliance. In everyday life, those who master kind, persuasive communication are able not only to “sell chilli” but also to build relationships, trust, and long-term influence. The proverb “Those who speak rudely cannot sell honey, those who speak nicely can sell chilli” offers timeless insight into the power of communication style. Honey symbolises sweetness and inherent desirability, while chilli symbolises difficulty and challenge. Yet the way we speak—whether with rudeness or kindness—determines whether value is recognised or dismissed. Research shows that rude communication overshadows even the best offerings, while kind and empathetic communication fosters trust, openness, and acceptance. In leadership, business, negotiations, and personal relationships alike, the tone of speech often outweighs content in shaping outcomes. Ultimately, the proverb reminds us that words carry power. Choosing to communicate with politeness, empathy, and respect enables us not only to sell chilli but also to turn obstacles into opportunities. In a world defined by complexity and diversity, the ability to speak kindly remains one of the most valuable human skills. References Adler, R.B., Rosenfeld, L.B. and Proctor II, R.F. (2019). Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication. 14th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bass, B.M. (1990). ‘From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision’. Organisational Dynamics, 18(3), pp.19–31. Brillat-Savarin, J.A. (2009). The Physiology of Taste. London: Penguin. Brown, … Read more

Managers and Leaders: Are They Different?

by

Within organisations, managers and leaders both play critical but distinct roles. While the terms are often used interchangeably in casual conversation, scholarly research demonstrates that they embody different skill sets, priorities, and functions. Leaders are typically associated with vision, inspiration, and change, while managers are more closely tied to structure, planning, and execution (Northouse, 2018). Both roles are necessary for organisational success, but they contribute in different ways. This article explores the key differences between managers and leaders, supported by research from textbooks, journal articles, and reputable sources. 1.0 Vision vs. Planning One of the most widely cited distinctions between managers and leaders lies in their approach to vision and planning. According to Kotter (1996), leaders focus on creating a compelling vision for the future, setting long-term goals, and motivating others to align with this vision. For example, leaders may articulate a strategic direction that positions the organisation within emerging markets or technological shifts. Conversely, managers emphasise planning and organisation. Fayol (1916), a foundational theorist in management, described management as involving forecasting, organising, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. Managers translate broader visions into actionable plans, breaking them down into short-term objectives and concrete steps. Without planning, a vision may remain abstract; without vision, planning risks becoming short-sighted. 2.0 Innovation and Change vs. Stability Innovation and adaptability are hallmarks of leadership. Bennis (1989) argued that leaders often act as agents of change, encouraging creativity and challenging the status quo. Leaders seek to transform organisational culture by embracing uncertainty and promoting experimentation. Managers, however, are more strongly associated with stability and efficiency. Drucker (1974) highlighted that management is fundamentally about making organisations work effectively through clear processes and systems. Managers safeguard organisational consistency, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and that operations are predictable. Both roles are essential: without leaders, organisations may stagnate; without managers, they may descend into chaos. 3.0 People vs. Tasks A further distinction lies in the leader’s focus on people and the manager’s focus on tasks. Leaders often concentrate on building strong relationships, inspiring trust, and fostering the development of individuals within the organisation. Goleman (2000) emphasised that effective leaders rely heavily on emotional intelligence, including empathy, motivation, and social skills. By engaging with people at a deeper level, leaders inspire loyalty and commitment. By contrast, managers prioritise the allocation of tasks, monitoring of progress, and ensuring efficiency in workflow. Mintzberg (1973) described managers as playing roles such as monitor, disseminator, and resource allocator, focusing on task execution rather than individual empowerment. Managers are therefore indispensable in ensuring that objectives are met within timeframes and budgets. 4.0 Inspiration vs. Control Inspiration is a defining feature of leadership. Sinek (2009) argued that leaders inspire by articulating a sense of purpose—what he famously calls the “why.” Through compelling communication and role-modelling, leaders create a culture in which individuals feel motivated to go beyond their basic responsibilities. On the other hand, managers exercise control through rules, policies, and procedures. Taylor (1911), in his work on scientific management, stressed that efficiency arises from close supervision and standardisation. While this approach has been criticised as rigid, it remains relevant in environments requiring compliance and precision, such as healthcare or aviation. A balance between inspiration and control is critical to maintaining both engagement and accountability. 5.0 Risk-Taking vs. Risk-Aversion Risk orientation is another dimension that separates leaders from managers. Kouzes and Posner (2012) describe leaders as willing to take calculated risks in pursuit of transformative opportunities. Leaders encourage experimentation, innovation, and bold decision-making, recognising that progress often entails uncertainty. In contrast, managers typically display risk aversion. Weber (1947) linked managerial practice to bureaucratic systems, where strict rules and rationality minimise errors. Managers are therefore more likely to adopt a cautious stance, focusing on risk management and stability rather than radical change. This difference can create tension within organisations, but also balance—leaders push boundaries while managers safeguard continuity. 6.0 Long-Term vs. Short-Term Perspective A long-term perspective distinguishes leaders from managers. Zaleznik (1977) argued that leaders think strategically about the future, positioning the organisation to thrive over decades rather than focusing narrowly on immediate concerns. Leaders envision where the organisation should be and mobilise resources towards that destination. Managers, however, typically maintain a short-term focus on operational efficiency (Fayol, 1916). They are responsible for meeting daily targets, managing budgets, and ensuring smooth functioning. While leaders may set the horizon, managers navigate the path day by day. Both perspectives are necessary, but too much emphasis on either can undermine performance: exclusive long-term focus risks neglecting current demands, while short-term fixation limits growth. 7.0 Communication Style Communication style also distinguishes leaders from managers. Leaders use storytelling and vision communication to inspire commitment. Denning (2005) argued that storytelling allows leaders to convey complex ideas in relatable ways, strengthening emotional connection with followers. By framing organisational change within compelling narratives, leaders build trust and engagement. Managers, however, adopt a more directive communication style, focusing on clarity, accuracy, and efficiency. Mintzberg (1973) identified managers as disseminators of information, ensuring that tasks are communicated and monitored effectively. While leaders inspire through vision, managers provide the structure and information necessary to ensure accountability. Balancing Leadership and Management Although the distinctions between leaders and managers are clear, scholars emphasise that organisations require both. Kotter (1996) notes that leadership without management may lead to visionary but uncoordinated initiatives, while management without leadership risks producing orderly but stagnant organisations. The most effective individuals often display both sets of qualities, shifting between leadership and management roles depending on context (Northouse, 2018). For example, during times of crisis, leadership qualities such as inspiration, vision, and risk-taking may be essential. However, in periods of routine operation, management skills such as planning, monitoring, and control ensure stability. Developing individuals who can integrate both roles is therefore a strategic priority for modern organisations. In sum, the distinction between managers and leaders lies in their contrasting approaches to vision, innovation, people, inspiration, risk, perspective, and communication. Leaders emphasise vision, change, empowerment, and long-term growth, while managers focus on planning, stability, task execution, … Read more

McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y: Leading Unmotivated Employees in the Workplace

by

Understanding employee motivation remains one of the central challenges of modern management. Douglas McGregor, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, addressed this challenge in his influential work The Human Side of Enterprise (1960), where he proposed Theory X and Theory Y as contrasting perspectives on workforce motivation. These two models reflect managers’ assumptions about employees and form the basis for distinct leadership and management styles. Theory X is based on the belief that employees inherently dislike work, require control, and resist responsibility. Conversely, Theory Y assumes that employees view work as natural, seek responsibility, and are motivated by higher-order needs such as creativity and self-actualisation. While the models may appear simplistic, they remain profoundly relevant for understanding how managers respond to unmotivated employees and for shaping effective leadership practices (Miner, 2005; Northouse, 2018). 1.0 Theory X: Managing Unmotivated Employees McGregor’s Theory X represents a pessimistic view of human behaviour in the workplace. It assumes that employees inherently dislike work, avoid responsibility, and must be coerced, controlled, and supervised to achieve organisational goals (McGregor, 1960). Assumptions of Theory X: Inherent dislike for work – Work is seen as a burden, and employees will attempt to avoid it when possible. Need for control – Strict rules, close supervision, and threats of punishment are necessary to ensure compliance. Avoidance of responsibility – Employees prefer direction and security rather than autonomy. Lack of ambition – Workers lack initiative and avoid opportunities to demonstrate leadership. Management Implications: Managers applying Theory X often adopt an authoritarian style, marked by strict supervision and a focus on task-orientation (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). These managers prioritise productivity and compliance over employee development. For example, in manufacturing plants where repetitive tasks and safety compliance are critical, Theory X practices such as tight control and monitoring can ensure standardisation and minimise risk. Similarly, in the military, strict hierarchies and obedience to orders remain necessary for discipline and operational success (Schein, 2010). However, Theory X has significant drawbacks. Excessive control can lead to low morale, lack of innovation, and high turnover (Greenberg, 2013). Employees who feel mistrusted or micromanaged may disengage, reinforcing the cycle of low motivation. 2.0 Theory Y: Unlocking Potential Through Empowerment In contrast, Theory Y reflects a more optimistic and modern view of human behaviour. McGregor (1960) argued that under the right conditions, employees not only accept responsibility but actively seek it. Assumptions of Theory Y: Work as natural – Employees may enjoy work as much as play when conditions are supportive. Self-direction – Workers can exercise autonomy when committed to objectives. Capacity for responsibility – Employees can be trusted to take initiative. Imagination and ingenuity – Creativity and problem-solving are widely distributed among employees. Motivation by higher needs – Beyond pay, employees seek self-actualisation, growth, and recognition (Maslow, 1943). Management Implications: Managers who embrace Theory Y tend to adopt a participative leadership style, encouraging collaboration, feedback, and shared decision-making (Hersey, Blanchard & Johnson, 2012). The emphasis shifts from controlling employees to empowering them, fostering development-oriented workplaces where individuals feel engaged and valued. Examples of Theory Y in practice can be seen in companies like Google, where employees are given 20% of their time to pursue innovative projects. This autonomy has led to the creation of successful products such as Gmail. Similarly, Southwest Airlines empowers employees to make customer service decisions on the spot, which has strengthened its reputation for service excellence (Kinicki & Fugate, 2016). By trusting employees and encouraging self-direction, Theory Y managers unlock intrinsic motivation, leading to higher creativity, stronger job satisfaction, and sustained organisational growth (Robbins & Judge, 2017). 3.0 Comparative Analysis: Theory X vs. Theory Y The practical value of McGregor’s work lies in its ability to highlight how managerial assumptions shape workplace culture and employee behaviour. Work Motivation: Theory X assumes employees are motivated primarily by extrinsic rewards and punishment avoidance. Theory Y emphasises intrinsic motivation such as achievement, recognition, and personal fulfilment. Management Style: Theory X supports a top-down, command-and-control style. Theory Y promotes a bottom-up, participative approach, with managers acting as facilitators. Employee Behaviour: Theory X predicts that employees require constant supervision and external direction. Theory Y assumes employees are capable of self-management and initiative. Organisational Culture: Theory X fosters rigid, hierarchical structures. Theory Y supports flexible, adaptive, and innovative cultures (Schein, 2010). While Theory Y is widely celebrated in modern organisations, there are contexts where elements of Theory X remain necessary. For example, in sectors such as aviation maintenance or nuclear energy, strict compliance and standardisation are essential to avoid catastrophic errors. Thus, the balance between the two approaches depends heavily on context. 4.0 Application in Modern Management Modern organisations increasingly draw from Theory Y principles as they recognise the importance of employee engagement and empowerment. Research by Latham and Pinder (2005) demonstrates that organisations adopting participative management achieve higher motivation and job satisfaction. 4.1 Blended Approaches In practice, many successful leaders combine aspects of both theories. For instance, Toyota’s lean manufacturing system incorporates close monitoring of processes (Theory X) alongside employee involvement in continuous improvement initiatives (Theory Y). This hybrid approach maintains discipline while fostering innovation (Greenberg, 2013). 4.2 Addressing Unmotivated Employees When faced with unmotivated employees, Theory X-style measures may be necessary in the short term to restore discipline. However, long-term improvement requires Theory Y strategies that focus on empowerment, training, and recognition. For example, a sales team with declining performance might initially face stricter targets and supervision (X), but sustainable improvement will emerge only if employees are later given development opportunities, autonomy, and incentives for innovation (Y). 4.3 Leadership Development Leadership training programmes often emphasise Theory Y principles, encouraging managers to adopt coaching and mentoring roles (Northouse, 2018). By investing in employees’ growth, managers not only motivate individuals but also strengthen organisational resilience. 5.0 Criticisms of Theory X and Theory Y While widely influential, McGregor’s framework has also been criticised for oversimplification. Critics argue that employees are not strictly Theory X or Theory Y but exhibit behaviours across both categories depending on context … Read more

Overcoming Despair: Embracing Life’s Simple Joys

by

Do you ever feel a sense of despair about life? It’s a common feeling that can be hard to shake off. But, with the right perspective, you can turn that despair into contentment and joy. Here’s How You can Shift Your Mindset and Embrace the Beauty of Your Life: Understanding Dissatisfaction Often, we find ourselves feeling unsatisfied with our lives. It’s easy to overlook the many blessings we have when we focus on what we lack. Consider this: there are countless people around the world who dream of having the life you lead. Many of them strive tirelessly, sometimes without success, to achieve what you already possess. Recognising this disparity can help put your own struggles into perspective. The Grass Isn’t Always Greener Have you ever looked up at an aeroplane and yearned to travel far away? The idea of leaving your daily life behind and exploring new places can be incredibly appealing. But think about the pilot of that plane. While we gaze up with envy, the pilot might be looking down at the villages, cities, and homes with a longing to return to their own familiar surroundings. This paradox highlights a crucial truth: no matter where we are or what we have, there’s always a part of us that yearns for something different. Accepting this can help you find peace with your current situation. Wealth and Happiness If wealth were the ultimate source of happiness, we would expect the rich to be perpetually joyful. However, reality tells a different story. Often, it’s not the wealthy who are seen dancing joyfully in the streets but those with modest means. The wealthy are frequently preoccupied with maintaining their security and managing their assets, which can prevent them from enjoying the simple pleasures of life. On the other hand, those who have less materially often find joy in everyday experiences and relationships. Power and Security Power is often associated with security, but this too can be misleading. If power guaranteed peace of mind, the powerful would live without the need for extensive security measures. Yet, it’s usually the ordinary people who can sleep soundly at night without the constant worry of threats or safety concerns. This suggests that true security comes not from power or influence but from a simpler, more grounded existence. Beauty, Fame, and Relationships We might think that beauty and fame lead to perfect relationships. However, celebrities, who seem to have it all, often struggle with their personal lives. This contradiction reveals that external appearances and public admiration do not necessarily equate to happiness or successful relationships. Real fulfilment in relationships comes from mutual respect, understanding, and genuine connection, which are not dependent on fame or physical attractiveness. Embrace Simplicity and Kindness The key to overcoming despair and finding joy in life lies in simplicity and kindness. Living a simple life, being humble, and helping others can bring immense satisfaction. Good deeds are never wasted; they create a positive ripple effect that can come back to you in unexpected ways. By focusing on what you can do for others and appreciating the small blessings in your life, you cultivate a sense of gratitude and contentment. Life is full of challenges and moments of despair, but it’s also filled with opportunities for joy and fulfilment. By shifting your focus from what you lack to what you have, and by valuing simplicity, kindness, and genuine connections, you can overcome feelings of despair. Remember, happiness is not found in wealth, power, beauty, or fame, but in the simple, everyday moments and the good we do for others. Embrace your life as it is, and you will find that despair gives way to a deep and lasting contentment.

Journey versus Destination: Which is More Important?

by

The question of whether the journey or the destination is more important is a deeply philosophical one that varies depending on individual perspectives and contexts. Here are Some Considerations for Both Sides: The Journey 1.0 Personal Growth: The journey often involves challenges, learning, and experiences that contribute to personal growth and development. This process of facing and overcoming obstacles helps individuals build resilience and character (Zachariah, 2020). 2.0 Memories and Experiences: The journey is filled with moments, interactions, and experiences that create lasting memories and shape who we are. These experiences are often the source of our most meaningful stories and lessons (Premier Sport Psychology, 2024). 3.0 Enjoyment of the Process: Focusing on the journey allows one to appreciate the present moment and find joy in the process rather than just the end goal. This approach helps individuals stay present and fully engaged in their current activities (Juliana, 2023). 4.0 Building Relationships: The journey can be an opportunity to build and strengthen relationships with others who are on the same path. Collaborative efforts and shared experiences often lead to deeper connections and mutual support (Liaqat & Rafique, 2023). The Destination 1.0 Achievement and Fulfilment: Reaching the destination often represents the achievement of a goal or dream, providing a sense of fulfilment and accomplishment. It signifies the culmination of efforts and the realisation of aspirations (Liaqat & Rafique, 2023). 2.0 Purpose and Direction: Having a clear destination provides direction and motivation, helping to navigate the journey with a purpose. Goals give meaning to our actions and drive us to strive for better outcomes (Juliana, 2023). 3.0 End Goals: Some journeys are specifically undertaken to reach a particular destination, whether it’s completing a project, achieving a career milestone, or arriving at a physical location. These goals often inspire us to embark on the journey in the first place (Premier Sport Psychology, 2024). Balancing Both 1.0 Integration: Finding a balance between enjoying the journey and striving towards the destination can lead to a more fulfilling and meaningful life. It involves recognising the value of both the process and the outcome (Zachariah, 2020). 3.0 Perspective: The importance of the journey versus the destination can change over time and in different contexts. Sometimes the journey is more enriching, while at other times, the destination holds greater significance (Liaqat & Rafique, 2023). 3.0 Mindset: Adopting a mindset that values both the process and the outcome can help maintain motivation and satisfaction throughout life’s endeavours. This balanced approach allows for continuous growth and contentment (Juliana, 2023). Ultimately, the importance of the journey versus the destination is a subjective matter that each person might view differently based on their values, experiences, and goals. Both aspects have their own unique significance and can complement each other in the pursuit of a meaningful life. References: Juliana, J. L. S. (2022) “Which Is More Important: Journey vs. Destination”. [Online]. Available at: https://coachcampus.com/coach-portfolios/power-tools/journey-vs-destination/. [Accessed on 30 May 2024]. Liaqat, M. & Rafique, F. (2024) “Journey vs. Destination — What’s the Difference”? [Online]. Available at: https://www.askdifference.com/journey-vs-destination/. [Accessed on 30 May 2024]. Premier Sport Psychology (2024) “Why the Journey is More Important Than the Destination”. [Online]. Available at: https://premiersportpsychology.com/2015/05/28/why-the-journey-is-more-important-than-the-destination/. [Accessed on 30 May 2024]. Zachariah, T. (2020) “Journey vs Destination: How to Stay Present”. TEDxMileHigh. [Online]. Available at: https://www.tedxmilehigh.com/journey-vs-destination/. [Accessed on 30 May 2024].

The Law of Attraction: Positive Thoughts Bring Positive Results and Negative Thoughts Bring Negative Results

by

The Law of Attraction is a widely discussed concept in self-help and motivational circles. It suggests that the nature of one’s thoughts, whether positive or negative, directly influences their life outcomes. 1.0 Positive Thoughts Bring Positive Results The central idea behind this aspect of the Law of Attraction is that maintaining a positive mindset attracts positive experiences and opportunities. This principle, often summarised as “like attracts like,” is grounded in the belief that positive thinking can manifest positive changes in various areas of life, including health, wealth, and relationships​ (Verywell Mind, 2024; BetterUp, 2024)​. Proponents argue that visualising success, practising gratitude, and using positive affirmations can help align one’s actions with their goals, ultimately leading to favourable outcomes​ (Science of People, 2024)​. 2.0 Negative Thoughts Bring Negative Results Conversely, the Law of Attraction posits that negative thinking can attract negative experiences and obstacles. By focusing on what one fears or dreads, individuals may inadvertently manifest those negative outcomes. This principle highlights the impact of a pessimistic outlook on one’s life circumstances, suggesting that negative thoughts and emotions can create a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure and dissatisfaction​ (Moon, 2022; Science of People, 2024)​. 3.0 Mechanisms and Practices 3.1 Visualisation: This involves creating detailed mental images of desired outcomes, which is believed to help align thoughts and actions towards achieving those goals​ (Moon, 2022; Science of People, 2024)​. 3.2 Affirmations: Positive statements repeated regularly to reinforce a positive self-image and mindset, such as “I am confident and successful”​ (Moon, 2022)​. 3.3 Gratitude: Focusing on what one is thankful for can shift attention from scarcity to abundance, promoting a more optimistic outlook and attracting positive experiences​ (Science of People, 2024)​. 4.4 Belief and Action: Believing in one’s goals and taking concrete steps towards them are crucial. The Law of Attraction emphasises that while positive thinking is essential, it must be complemented by proactive behaviour to achieve desired results​ (Science of People, 2024)​. 4.0 Criticisms and Considerations 4.1 Lack of Scientific Evidence: Critics argue that there is no empirical scientific evidence supporting the Law of Attraction, often categorising it as pseudoscience. They acknowledge that while positive thinking can have beneficial psychological effects, it is not a guaranteed path to success​ (Science of People, 2024)​. 4.2 Oversimplification: Some suggest that the Law of Attraction oversimplifies the complexities of life and human experience. They argue that positive thinking alone may not be sufficient to overcome significant challenges or external factors​ (BetterUp, 2024)​. 4.3 Potential for Blame: The philosophy can lead to self-blame if things go wrong, as individuals might feel solely responsible for attracting negative outcomes through their thoughts​ (Science of People, 2024)​. Despite these criticisms, many people find value in the Law of Attraction as a motivational tool for personal growth and goal achievement. It encourages positive thinking, proactive behaviour, and a more optimistic outlook on life​ (Verywell Mind, 2024; Moon, 2022)​. References: Verywell Mind (2024) “Understanding the Law of Attraction.” [Online]. Available at: https://www.verywellmind.com/understanding-and-using-the-law-of-attraction-3144808. [Accessed on 21 May 2024]. BetterUp (2024) “What Is the Law of Attraction? 7 Ways to Use It.” [Online]. Available at: https://www.betterup.com/blog/what-is-law-of-attraction#:~:text=Here%20are%20seven%20ways%20to,every%20situation%20you’re%20in. [Accessed on 21 May 2024]. Science of People (2024) “Law of Attraction: What Does Science Say About This Theory?” [Online]. Available at: https://www.scienceofpeople.com/law-of-attraction/. [Accessed on 21 May 2024]. Moon, L. (2022) The Only Law of Attraction Book You’ll Ever Need. Independently Published.

Kindness at Work: Benefits and Ways to Foster It

by

In the fast-paced and often high-pressure world of modern work, kindness may seem like a soft skill secondary to performance or technical ability. However, increasing evidence suggests that kindness is a key driver of workplace success, employee well-being, and organisational resilience. As O’Neill (2024) explains, kindness in the workplace is not just about being nice—it involves prosocial behaviours such as empathy, compassion, and supportive communication that enhance collective performance. Acts of kindness build stronger relationships, improve morale, and foster a positive organisational culture, creating environments where people can thrive both personally and professionally. 1.0 Benefits of Kindness at Work 1.1 Enhanced Productivity One of the most tangible benefits of kindness at work is enhanced productivity. When employees treat each other with respect and kindness, it fosters a sense of belonging and psychological safety. Scott (2023) highlights that kind acts stimulate morale and motivation, making people more willing to collaborate and contribute ideas. Kindness creates a positive feedback loop—a supportive environment encourages effort, which in turn enhances results. For instance, research by Cameron and Caza (2004) found that organisations that value compassion and kindness experience higher levels of engagement and innovation. Employees are more likely to go beyond their job descriptions and demonstrate organisational citizenship behaviours, which ultimately improve efficiency and performance. 1.2 Improved Mental Health A workplace culture grounded in kindness significantly contributes to better mental health. According to Curry et al. (2021), engaging in and witnessing acts of kindness can reduce stress, anxiety, and depression. Employees who feel supported are less likely to experience burnout and more likely to maintain motivation during challenging times. In practical terms, kindness at work can take many forms—listening to a colleague who feels overwhelmed, acknowledging effort, or simply offering encouragement. These small gestures can buffer the negative effects of workplace stress, promoting psychological resilience. This sense of emotional safety improves both mental and physical well-being, reducing absenteeism and improving focus and creativity. 1.3 Stronger Relationships Kindness strengthens trust and camaraderie among employees. Trust is the cornerstone of effective teamwork, and acts of kindness reinforce it by showing that colleagues can rely on one another. O’Neill (2024) asserts that interpersonal kindness fosters openness and cooperation, reducing conflicts and misunderstandings. Dirks and Ferrin (2002) found that trust in leadership and among peers directly correlates with improved team cohesion and performance outcomes. For example, when a manager offers genuine support to an employee facing personal difficulties, it builds relational capital that enhances long-term loyalty and engagement. Over time, these relationships form the foundation of a collaborative, high-functioning team. 1.4 Increased Job Satisfaction Kindness has a measurable effect on job satisfaction. Employees who feel valued, supported, and respected are more satisfied with their work and more committed to their organisations (Scott, 2023). A workplace that encourages kindness provides intrinsic motivation, making employees feel their work has meaning beyond mere output. In a survey by the Greater Good Science Center (2022), workers in “high-kindness” environments reported 40% higher job satisfaction than those in competitive, high-pressure settings. This satisfaction translates into lower turnover rates and stronger organisational commitment, as people are naturally drawn to environments where they feel safe, appreciated, and understood. 1.5 Positive Company Culture A culture of kindness enhances organisational identity and reputation. Scott (2023) notes that companies known for their supportive cultures not only retain top talent but also attract high-quality candidates who value emotional intelligence and collaboration. In customer-facing industries, kindness cascades outward: employees who feel cared for extend the same courtesy to clients, strengthening brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. For example, Virgin Group’s “People First” approach, which prioritises empathy and kindness towards employees, has been linked to higher staff retention and consistent customer satisfaction. This underscores the strategic value of kindness as a business asset rather than merely an ethical choice. 2.0 Ways to Foster Kindness at Work 2.1 Lead by Example Kindness must start at the top. Leaders and managers set the tone for workplace culture. O’Neill (2024) emphasises that leaders who demonstrate empathy, gratitude, and fairness encourage others to mirror the same behaviour. Publicly recognising acts of kindness—such as through team meetings or newsletters—reinforces a positive behavioural norm. 2.2 Encourage Peer Recognition Peer recognition systems help embed kindness into daily routines. Scott (2023) suggests using “thank-you” notes, shout-outs during meetings, or digital recognition platforms. These tools make appreciation visible and encourage ongoing prosocial behaviour. Recognising colleagues’ efforts, even for small contributions, builds morale and cultivates gratitude across the team. 2.3 Create a Supportive Environment A psychologically safe environment allows employees to express themselves openly. Curry et al. (2021) stress that workplaces fostering emotional support see lower turnover and higher engagement. Employers can achieve this by providing access to mental health resources, counselling services, or well-being workshops. Such initiatives signal genuine care and promote a culture of inclusion. 2.4 Promote Team Building Team-building activities can strengthen empathy and understanding among staff. O’Neill (2024) suggests activities like cooperative games, problem-solving workshops, and shared volunteering. When employees engage in meaningful collaboration outside of their usual work tasks, they develop stronger interpersonal bonds, leading to more cohesive teams. 2.5 Offer Opportunities for Growth Kindness extends to supporting personal and professional growth. Providing mentorship programmes, training opportunities, and career advancement pathways demonstrates care for employees’ futures. According to Mullins (2020), such investment communicates respect and trust, fostering loyalty and intrinsic motivation. 2.6 Practise Active Listening Active listening is an everyday form of kindness. By truly listening, leaders and colleagues show respect for others’ ideas and concerns. O’Neill (2024) explains that active listening—maintaining eye contact, paraphrasing, and responding thoughtfully—creates a sense of validation and belonging, which encourages open communication and problem-solving. 2.7 Provide Flexibility Flexibility in scheduling and workload management demonstrates understanding of employees’ work-life balance needs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, flexibility became a key indicator of organisational compassion. O’Neill (2024) found that companies allowing hybrid or flexible arrangements saw higher morale and lower stress levels, highlighting flexibility as a form of structural kindness. 2.8 Celebrate Milestones and Achievements Celebrating professional and personal milestones fosters collective joy … Read more

About Us
Legal & Compliance