Mohammad T Islam (BSc, MBA, MEd)

The Power of Forgiveness

by

“The Power of Forgiveness” explores the transformative impact forgiveness can have on individuals and communities. Forgiveness, as a concept and practice, involves letting go of feelings of resentment, anger, or vengeance towards someone who has harmed you, whether they actually deserve your forgiveness or not. It’s a personal journey that can lead to healing, release from emotional burden, and ultimately, a form of freedom. Emotional Healing Forgiveness can lead to profound emotional healing. Holding onto anger and resentment can be harmful to one’s emotional health, leading to negative effects such as stress, anxiety, and depression. Forgiving someone can lift these burdens, leading to improved mental health and wellbeing (Mayo Clinic, 2022). According to the American Psychological Association (APA), forgiveness can significantly reduce the symptoms of depression and anxiety by allowing individuals to let go of the emotional weight that accompanies resentment (American Psychological Association, 2021). Additionally, a study published in the Journal of Behavioural Medicine found that individuals who practised forgiveness experienced lower levels of anger and hostility, which are closely linked to various mental health disorders (Toussaint, Shields, & Slavich, 2016). By choosing to forgive, people can unshackle themselves from the emotional turmoil that hinders their ability to experience joy and contentment. Improved Physical Health Research has shown that forgiveness is linked to better physical health outcomes. People who forgive are less likely to experience high blood pressure, heart disease, and other stress-related illnesses (Swartz, 2022). This is likely because forgiveness can reduce stress, a known risk factor for many chronic diseases. A study in the American Journal of Cardiology demonstrated that individuals who practised forgiveness had significantly lower blood pressure levels compared to those who held grudges (Lawler et al., 2003). Furthermore, the act of forgiving has been associated with better immune system functioning, which can protect against a range of illnesses (Worthington & Scherer, 2004). These findings suggest that the benefits of forgiveness extend beyond mental health, promoting overall physical wellbeing. Enhanced Relationships Forgiveness can strengthen relationships by promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion (Mayo Clinic, 2022). It can help resolve conflicts and prevent the erosion of important relationships over time. Even in cases where the relationship does not continue, forgiveness can help individuals move on without carrying the weight of past hurts. In a comprehensive review published in Personality and Social Psychology Review, researchers found that forgiveness is crucial for the maintenance and repair of relationships, contributing to greater relationship satisfaction and stability (Fincham, 2000). By fostering forgiveness, individuals can build stronger, more resilient connections with others, enhancing both personal and professional relationships. Personal Growth The process of forgiving can lead to personal growth and self-awareness. It often requires one to reflect on their own values, understand their emotions, and sometimes, acknowledge their own role in a conflict (Swartz, 2022). This introspection can be a powerful catalyst for personal development. According to Dr. Robert Enright, a pioneer in the study of forgiveness, engaging in the forgiveness process encourages self-examination and moral growth, leading to a deeper understanding of oneself and others (Enright, 2001). This journey of self-discovery can foster greater emotional intelligence, helping individuals navigate life’s challenges with resilience and grace. Contribution to a More Compassionate Society On a larger scale, forgiveness can contribute to a more compassionate and understanding society. It fosters a culture of empathy, where people are more likely to work through conflicts peacefully and support each other’s healing processes (Mayo Clinic, 2022). Research published in the Journal of Peace Psychology indicates that communities that embrace forgiveness are more likely to experience lower levels of violence and higher levels of social cohesion (Staub, Pearlman, Gubin, & Hagengimana, 2005). By promoting forgiveness, societies can move towards greater harmony and cooperation, addressing conflicts in constructive ways. Challenges of Forgiveness Forgiving is not always easy, especially in cases of deep hurt or betrayal. It is a process that can take time and may require support from others, such as friends, family, or professionals. Forgiveness does not mean forgetting the harm done or excusing unacceptable behaviour. Instead, it’s about finding a way to move forward without being anchored to the pain of the past. Dr. Fred Luskin, director of the Stanford Forgiveness Project, emphasises that forgiveness is a gradual process that involves acknowledging the pain, finding meaning in the suffering, and eventually letting go of the anger (Luskin, 2002). This journey can be challenging, but the rewards of emotional and physical healing make it a worthwhile endeavour. The power of forgiveness lies in its ability to transform lives by freeing individuals from the chains of negative emotions tied to past events. It opens the door to healing, growth, and the possibility of more meaningful and positive relationships. By embracing forgiveness, individuals can take significant steps towards leading happier, healthier, and more fulfilling lives. References American Psychological Association (2021) “The Road to Forgiveness”. [Online]. Available at: https://www.apa.org/topics/forgiveness-road [Accessed 3 Mar 2024]. Enright, R. D. (2001) Forgiveness Is a Choice: A Step-by-Step Process for Resolving Anger and Restoring Hope. American Psychological Association. Fincham, F. D. (2000) “The Kiss of the Porcupines: From Attributing Responsibility to Forgiving”. Personal Relationships. 7(1), pp. 1-23. Lawler, K. A., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., Edmondson, K. A., & Jones, W. H. (2003) “The Unique Effects of Forgiveness on Health: An Exploration of Pathways”. Journal of Behavioural Medicine. 26(4), pp. 349-363. Luskin, F. (2002) Forgive for Good: A Proven Prescription for Health and Happiness. HarperOne. Mayo Clinic. (2022) “Forgiveness: Letting Go of Grudges and Bitterness”. [Online]. Available at: https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/in-depth/forgiveness/art-20047692 [Accessed 3 Mar 2024]. Staub, E., Pearlman, L. A., Gubin, A., & Hagengimana, A. (2005) “Healing, Reconciliation, Forgiving and the Prevention of Violence After Genocide or Mass Killing: An Intervention And its Experimental Evaluation in Rwanda”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 24(3), pp. 297-334. Swartz, K. (2022) “The Healing Power of Forgiveness. Johns Hopkins Health”. [Online]. Available at: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/the-healing-power-of-forgiveness [Accessed 3 Mar 2024]. Toussaint, L., Shields, G. S., & Slavich, G. M. (2016) “Forgiveness, Stress, and Health: A 5-Week Dynamic Parallel … Read more

Consumer Behaviour: Customer Preferences and Decision-Making Explained

by

Understanding consumer behaviour and psychology is vital for anticipating needs, tailoring services, and creating positive consumer experiences (Solomon, 2019). This comprehensive understanding involves delving into the intricacies of consumer behaviour, preferences, and decision-making processes, as well as considering cultural, psychological, and technological influences on consumption. In today’s competitive markets, businesses that effectively analyse consumer behaviour are better positioned to deliver value, foster loyalty, and achieve sustainable growth. The Importance of Understanding Consumer Behaviour In the realm of business, consumer behaviour analysis is fundamental for designing effective strategies. By identifying the factors that influence purchase decisions, organisations can create tailored offerings that resonate with consumer expectations. According to Solomon (2019), firms that understand the motivations behind consumer purchases are better able to meet needs, leading to enhanced satisfaction and loyalty. Similarly, Kotler and Keller (2016) argue that insights into consumer behaviour enable businesses to anticipate market trends and respond proactively, rather than reactively. For instance, in the fashion industry, fast-fashion retailers such as Zara leverage consumer behaviour analysis to quickly adapt designs to emerging trends. By monitoring preferences and behaviours, Zara is able to shorten product development cycles, maintaining relevance and driving sales (Ghemawat & Nueno, 2006). This illustrates how understanding consumer behaviour can directly influence operational and strategic decisions. Consumer Behaviour and Preferences Consumer behaviour is defined as the study of how individuals allocate their resources to consumption-related activities, including what they buy, why they buy, when they buy, where they buy, and how they use and dispose of products. Schiffman and Wisenblit (2015) emphasise that consumer preferences are influenced by cultural, social, personal, and psychological factors. Cultural influences include values, traditions, and social norms that guide consumption. For example, dietary habits shaped by religion can strongly influence food purchases. Social influences involve family and peer groups, which often play a role in shaping brand choices and purchase decisions. Teenagers, for instance, may be influenced by peers when choosing clothing brands. Personal factors include age, lifestyle, and occupation, all of which affect product preferences. For example, young professionals may favour convenience-driven services such as meal delivery apps. Psychological factors such as motivation, perception, and learning guide how consumers interpret and respond to marketing stimuli. Companies often use these insights to tailor their offerings. For example, Nike integrates social and cultural elements into campaigns, such as those promoting inclusivity and diversity, which resonate strongly with different consumer groups. Psychological Influences on Consumer Behaviour Psychological factors are among the most significant determinants of consumer behaviour. These include: Perception: The process by which consumers interpret sensory inputs to form a meaningful understanding (Kotler & Keller, 2016). For instance, packaging design and branding can influence perceptions of quality. Motivation: The internal drive that compels consumers to act, often explained by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (1943). A luxury car may appeal to esteem needs, while organic food may address health and safety needs. Learning: Repeated experiences shape consumer responses. Loyalty programmes, such as those offered by airlines, reinforce repeat purchases through rewards. Beliefs and attitudes: These shape how consumers evaluate products and brands. Negative publicity can influence beliefs, reducing demand even if the product remains unchanged. For example, the popularity of eco-friendly products reflects both motivational and attitudinal factors, as consumers increasingly value sustainability and ethical production. Decision-Making Processes The consumer decision-making process is typically described in five stages: need recognition, information search, evaluation of alternatives, purchase decision, and post-purchase behaviour (Engel, Kollat & Blackwell, 1968). At the need recognition stage, marketers create awareness of unmet needs through advertising. During the information search phase, firms can provide targeted digital content and customer reviews to influence choices. At the evaluation stage, comparisons between alternatives are made, with brand reputation often serving as a key determinant. The purchase decision reflects the outcome of these considerations, while post-purchase behaviour influences future loyalty and word-of-mouth recommendations. For instance, in the smartphone industry, companies such as Samsung and Apple compete heavily in the evaluation stage by emphasising innovation and ecosystem benefits. Post-purchase satisfaction, reinforced by customer service, ensures ongoing loyalty. The Role of Digital Behaviour Analysis In the digital age, analysing online consumer behaviour has become increasingly important. Consumers leave digital footprints through browsing patterns, social media interactions, and e-commerce transactions. Chaffey and Smith (2017) argue that digital analytics tools allow businesses to capture these behaviours, generating valuable insights. For example, online retailers track metrics such as click-through rates, dwell times, and cart abandonment to refine digital experiences. By using predictive analytics, companies can personalise content, improving engagement and conversion rates. Netflix offers a powerful case study: its recommendation engine analyses user viewing patterns to suggest tailored content, keeping customers engaged and reducing churn (Gomez-Uribe & Hunt, 2016). This demonstrates how digital behaviour analysis translates into competitive advantage. Case Studies and Applications Several organisations have demonstrated the effectiveness of consumer behaviour analysis: Amazon employs advanced algorithms to analyse shopping patterns and recommend products (Smith, 2018). This personalised experience significantly boosts sales and customer retention. Starbucks uses loyalty card data and mobile app insights to refine product offerings. Garthwaite (2017) notes that by aligning menu innovations with customer preferences, Starbucks enhances both satisfaction and loyalty. Coca-Cola conducts extensive consumer research to adapt to cultural preferences in global markets. Its strategy of offering locally customised flavours demonstrates how behavioural insights can support global expansion (Pendergrast, 2013). These cases illustrate that understanding consumer behaviour is not only an academic pursuit but also a practical necessity for achieving market success. Challenges in Understanding Consumer Behaviour While consumer behaviour analysis offers immense value, it is not without challenges. Complexity of behaviour: Human decision-making is influenced by numerous interrelated factors, making behaviour difficult to predict accurately (Schiffman & Wisenblit, 2015). Rapid change: Consumer preferences shift rapidly, influenced by technological advances and cultural trends. For example, the rise of plant-based diets reflects evolving health and sustainability concerns. Privacy concerns: Digital behaviour analysis raises ethical issues regarding data collection and usage. Striking a balance between personalisation and privacy is critical in building trust (Solomon, 2019). These challenges … Read more

Change Management Models: Navigating the Challenges of Change to Achieve Sustainable Transformation

by

Change management is a structured discipline concerned with preparing, supporting, and guiding individuals, teams, and organisations through transformation. As organisations face increasing technological disruption, global competition, and sustainability demands, adopting effective frameworks becomes essential (Cameron & Green, 2015). This article explores three widely recognised Change management models—Lewin’s Three-Step Model, Kotter’s 8-Step Process, and the ADKAR framework—and compares their applicability in achieving sustainable transformation. Lewin’s Change Management Model Introduced by Kurt Lewin (1951), this foundational model remains influential due to its simplicity. It consists of three stages: Unfreeze: Preparing stakeholders by breaking down the existing status quo. Leaders must communicate why change is necessary and overcome inertia. Burnes (2017) stresses that “unfreezing” requires destabilising current habits while creating a compelling vision of the future. For example, in the financial services industry, unfreezing has been critical when adopting regulatory reforms after crises. Change: Transitioning towards new practices. This stage requires training, communication, and leadership support. Employees often feel uncertain, making empathy and resources vital. Refreeze: Embedding new practices into organisational culture. Without this step, employees may revert to old behaviours. For instance, in healthcare, digital record adoption only succeeded once institutions reinforced new systems with ongoing training and leadership advocacy (Burnes, 2017). Lewin’s model is best suited for structured environments requiring incremental transformation. However, critics argue it oversimplifies today’s continuous, non-linear changes (Memana, 2025). Kotter’s 8-Step Process for Leading Change John Kotter (1996) expanded Lewin’s work with a step-by-step framework for large-scale transformation. The steps are: Create a Sense of Urgency: Highlight risks of inaction. Form a Powerful Coalition: Assemble a team of influential leaders. Create a Vision for Change: Define a compelling direction. Communicate the Vision: Ensure clarity and repetition across levels. Remove Obstacles: Empower staff and eliminate structural barriers. Create Short-Term Wins: Demonstrate early progress to build momentum. Build on the Change: Consolidate gains and refine processes. Anchor Changes in Culture: Ensure long-term alignment with values. Kotter’s model is particularly effective for complex transformations such as mergers, acquisitions, or sustainability initiatives. For example, Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan applied Kotter’s principles, using urgency and cultural anchoring to embed environmental values. Recent applications show its ongoing relevance. Yalçın (2025) highlights its use in digital transformation projects, where urgency, coalitions, and cultural embedding are crucial for achieving sustainable outcomes. However, critics note the model’s linearity may not reflect the iterative realities of modern change (Gaur & Bisht, 2025). The ADKAR Model Developed by Jeff Hiatt (2006), the ADKAR framework focuses on the individual experience of change. Its five components are: Awareness of the need for change. Desire to support the change. Knowledge of how to change. Ability to implement behaviours. Reinforcement to sustain outcomes. ADKAR’s strength lies in its focus on personal adoption, recognising that organisational transformation only succeeds when individuals transition effectively. For example, in IT system rollouts, ADKAR has been used to diagnose why employees resist adoption and to tailor targeted interventions (Hiatt & Creasey, 2012). Modern research supports its relevance. Memana (2025) notes that ADKAR aligns with ethical and participatory approaches, fostering employee engagement and sustainable results. Similarly, case studies in higher education demonstrate its value in aligning learning and cultural transformation. Comparing the Models While all three models provide valuable insights, they differ in scope and emphasis: Lewin’s model: Strength lies in its clarity and structure. However, it may oversimplify ongoing transformations in fast-moving industries. Kotter’s model: Provides a detailed roadmap with emphasis on leadership and momentum. Criticised for being too rigid in agile environments. ADKAR model: Excels at individual-level change, making it suitable for HR and digital training initiatives. Less suited to macro-level organisational strategy. Scholars now argue for hybrid approaches. Gaur and Bisht (2025) propose combining Kotter’s urgency-building with ADKAR’s reinforcement to ensure both organisational momentum and individual adoption in sustainable technology adoption projects. Challenges in Applying Models Despite their strengths, applying change models presents challenges: Cultural barriers: Organisations with rigid hierarchies may resist participatory models such as ADKAR. Continuous disruption: Linear models like Lewin’s and Kotter’s may struggle to adapt to ongoing transformations. Leadership commitment: Without sponsorship, even the best frameworks fail. As Yalçın (2025) stresses, leadership vision is non-negotiable in digital and sustainability transitions. Real-World Applications Healthcare: Hospitals applying ADKAR for electronic health record adoption achieved higher compliance when focusing on awareness and reinforcement. Technology: Microsoft’s transformation under Satya Nadella integrated Kotter’s urgency-building with cultural anchoring, enabling a growth mindset culture. Education: Universities applying Lewin’s model to curriculum reforms found “refreezing” challenging due to ongoing digital disruption, requiring iterative refinements (Memana, 2025). Towards Sustainable Transformation Sustainability has become a dominant theme in change management. Kotter’s urgency and cultural embedding are crucial for sustainability initiatives, while ADKAR ensures individual alignment with environmental goals. Yalçın (2025) shows how organisations adopting hybrid models can embed sustainability not just structurally, but behaviourally. Change management models remain indispensable tools for navigating organisational transformation. Lewin’s model offers simplicity and clarity; Kotter’s framework delivers a structured roadmap; ADKAR focuses on individual journeys. However, sustainable transformation often requires a blended approach, combining urgency, structured leadership, and individual reinforcement. As organisations face continuous digital and sustainability pressures, leaders must not treat these models as rigid formulas but as adaptive guides. By integrating classic and modern approaches, organisations can overcome resistance, engage stakeholders, and achieve transformations that are both effective and sustainable. References Burnes, B. (2017). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. Journal of Change Management, 17(2), pp. 91–100. Cameron, E. & Green, M. (2015). Making Sense of Change Management. 4th ed. Kogan Page. Gaur, M.H. & Bisht, B. (2025). Strategic frameworks for successful technology adoption and change management. WAIMSC Proceedings. Available at: ResearchGate Hiatt, J.M. (2006). ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government, and our Community. Prosci Research. Hiatt, J.M. & Creasey, T.J. (2012). Change Management: The People Side of Change. 2nd ed. Prosci Learning Center. Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press. Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Row. Memana, P. (2025). Leadership in education during transformation: Sustainable and participatory approaches. … Read more

Target Market Identification: How to Find Your Ideal Customer

by

In the dynamic and competitive landscape of modern business, understanding and reaching the right audience is crucial for organisational success. Target market identification, a fundamental aspect of market research, involves segmenting the overall market into smaller groups of consumers with similar characteristics or needs. By identifying these segments, businesses can tailor their marketing strategies, communication efforts, and product offerings to maximise effectiveness and efficiency (Baker & Hart, 2020). Rather than appealing to a mass audience, target market identification allows for precision marketing—an approach that improves customer satisfaction, enhances loyalty, and increases profitability. This article explores the key processes involved, including market segmentation, targeting, and positioning (STP), while highlighting the tools and techniques that enable firms to identify their ideal customers. Market Segmentation: A Critical Process Market segmentation is the process of dividing a broad market into sub-groups of consumers with shared characteristics. This strategy recognises that consumers are not homogenous, but rather display varying needs, preferences, and behaviours (Kotler & Keller, 2016). By segmenting markets, organisations gain a structured understanding of customer diversity, enabling more personalised marketing strategies. The four major segmentation bases are: demographic, geographic, psychographic, and behavioural. Each provides a unique lens for analysing consumer groups. Demographic Segmentation Demographic segmentation divides markets using measurable variables such as age, gender, income, education, occupation, and family size. This method is widely used due to the ease of obtaining demographic data and its predictive value in consumer demand. For instance, luxury car brands often target high-income professionals aged 35–55 who seek products that signify status and prestige. Similarly, educational institutions segment by age and education level to target undergraduates or postgraduate students (Kotler & Keller, 2016). The strength of demographic segmentation lies in its clarity and simplicity, although critics argue that it can sometimes oversimplify consumer motivations, requiring it to be combined with psychographic or behavioural insights for richer understanding (Schiffman & Wisenblit, 2019). Geographic Segmentation Geographic segmentation divides markets by location-based variables such as country, region, climate, or population density. This form of segmentation is especially valuable when cultural, environmental, or infrastructural differences affect product needs. For example, clothing retailers adjust product lines based on climate—heavy coats in Northern Europe and lightweight apparel in Mediterranean countries. Similarly, fast-food chains adapt menus regionally; McDonald’s offers vegetarian options in India to reflect cultural dietary norms (Hollensen, 2015). Geographic segmentation ensures local relevance, though its effectiveness is amplified when paired with psychographic or behavioural data that reveal underlying consumer motivations. Psychographic Segmentation Psychographic segmentation explores lifestyle, values, attitudes, interests, and personality traits. Unlike demographics, which describe who the customer is, psychographics explain why they buy. For instance, a company producing organic health products may target consumers with sustainability-focused lifestyles and values around wellness. Sportswear brands like Nike or Lululemon appeal to consumers with active, health-conscious lifestyles, framing their products as tools for self-improvement and achievement (Solomon, 2018). This approach provides deep insights into consumer motivations, enabling the creation of highly resonant brand narratives. However, psychographic data is more difficult to collect and interpret compared to demographic information (Revella, 2015). Behavioural Segmentation Behavioural segmentation categorises consumers based on their interactions with products, including purchase frequency, usage rate, brand loyalty, and benefits sought. For example, airline companies often segment customers into frequent business travellers versus occasional holidaymakers. Each group requires different value propositions—business travellers seek flexibility and loyalty programmes, while leisure travellers prioritise affordable fares (Schiffman & Wisenblit, 2019). Behavioural segmentation is particularly effective because it captures real-world actions, allowing firms to design personalised experiences and predict future behaviour. Targeting: Selecting the Ideal Market Segment After segmentation, businesses must evaluate the attractiveness of each segment and decide which to pursue. Targeting involves assessing factors such as market size, growth potential, accessibility, competition, and alignment with organisational strengths (Hooley, Piercy, & Nicoulaud, 2012). Several targeting strategies can be employed: Undifferentiated marketing, focusing on the entire market with one strategy. Differentiated marketing, targeting multiple segments with tailored offerings. Concentrated marketing, focusing on one niche segment. Micromarketing, tailoring offerings to specific individuals or localised groups. The choice of strategy depends on organisational goals and resources. For example, niche skincare brands often adopt concentrated marketing, targeting eco-conscious consumers, whereas multinational corporations like Coca-Cola adopt differentiated strategies, offering a variety of products to appeal to multiple demographic and behavioural groups. Positioning: Building a Distinctive Identity Once target markets are selected, firms must establish positioning—the process of shaping a brand’s identity in consumers’ minds. Positioning ensures that products are perceived as distinct from competitors and relevant to target customers (Ries & Trout, 2001). For example, Volvo positions itself around safety and reliability, while Tesla emphasises innovation and sustainability. Successful positioning strategies highlight unique selling propositions (USPs) and communicate them consistently across all marketing channels. Tools and Techniques for Target Market Identification Several tools and frameworks assist in identifying target markets: SWOT analysis evaluates organisational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, helping firms identify promising segments (Helms & Nixon, 2010). Buyer personas are fictional yet research-based profiles that represent ideal customers. They encapsulate demographics, psychographics, pain points, and goals, helping marketers craft personalised strategies (Revella, 2015). Data analytics techniques such as cluster analysis and predictive modelling allow firms to analyse large datasets, revealing hidden patterns and emerging consumer segments (Wedel & Kamakura, 2012). Technological advancements, including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, further enhance precision in market segmentation, enabling real-time personalisation of customer interactions (Wedel & Kannan, 2016). The Strategic Importance of Target Market Identification Effective target market identification ensures that organisations allocate resources efficiently and focus efforts where they will yield the greatest returns. By identifying and serving the right customer groups, firms not only enhance profitability but also strengthen customer satisfaction, loyalty, and brand equity. Moreover, in a world of increasing competition and consumer choice, understanding the nuances of target markets is essential for building long-term relationships. As markets evolve with technological, cultural, and social changes, the ability to continuously refine segmentation and targeting strategies will remain a critical source of competitive advantage. Target market identification is more than an … Read more

Market Research: Understanding Consumer Behaviours

by

Market research is a critical pillar of contemporary business strategy. It involves the systematic collection, recording, and analysis of data related to consumers, competitors, and the overall market environment. The insights derived from market research enable organisations to understand not only what consumers want, but also why they want it, how they behave, and how best to meet their needs. Effective market research contributes to a range of organisational outcomes, from product development to branding, pricing, and promotion, making it an essential tool for sustainable competitive advantage (Malhotra, Birks and Wills, 2021). Understanding Consumer Behaviour One of the foremost objectives of market research is to understand consumer behaviour — a term that encapsulates the decision-making processes individuals or groups undertake in selecting, purchasing, using, or disposing of products and services. According to Kotler, Armstrong and Opresnik (2020), consumer behaviour is shaped by a complex interplay of cultural, social, personal, and psychological factors. Surveys and focus groups are commonly deployed to gather data in this area. Surveys are effective for obtaining quantitative data about consumer demographics, preferences, and purchase habits. They offer the advantage of scale, enabling researchers to collect data from a large number of respondents. Focus groups, by contrast, allow for qualitative insights, capturing the attitudes, perceptions, and emotions of consumers in a more interactive setting (Krueger and Casey, 2015). These methods offer complementary perspectives, combining statistical reliability with rich contextual understanding. Understanding why consumers choose one product over another, how they form brand loyalties, or what price points they find acceptable allows businesses to tailor their strategies accordingly. For example, a company entering a new market may conduct exploratory research to determine local preferences, adjusting its marketing mix based on insights gathered (Malhotra et al., 2021). Competitive Analysis Another important dimension of market research is competitor analysis. Knowing the strengths and weaknesses of competitors allows firms to identify opportunities for differentiation and innovation. As Wilson (2014) notes, competitive intelligence can reveal gaps in the market or inefficiencies in competitors’ strategies that can be capitalised upon. This aspect of market research often relies on secondary data sources such as competitor websites, industry reports, and financial statements. By analysing these sources, businesses can benchmark their performance, pricing strategies, distribution channels, and promotional tactics against rivals. Kotler et al. (2020) stress the importance of SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis in strategic planning, which is typically underpinned by thorough competitive research. For instance, a small e-commerce company may track competitors’ website traffic and social media engagement to evaluate their market position and customer engagement strategies. This analysis can inform the firm’s own branding, UX design, and promotional offers. Market Trends and Forecasting In today’s volatile economic landscape, the ability to anticipate changes is essential. Market research is instrumental in identifying and analysing market trends — long-term movements in consumer preferences, technological innovation, or regulatory frameworks. Bradley (2013) argues that businesses must not only understand current consumer demands but also anticipate future shifts to remain competitive. Trend analysis can highlight emerging customer segments, lifestyle changes, or environmental concerns that may influence purchasing decisions. For example, the increasing focus on sustainability has led many firms to explore eco-friendly packaging or carbon-neutral logistics. Forecasting, which relies on historical data and statistical modelling, enables businesses to make informed predictions about future demand, pricing trends, or product life cycles. Data visualisation tools and predictive analytics software make it easier for decision-makers to interpret complex datasets and plan accordingly (Hair et al., 2019). For example, a clothing retailer may analyse three years of seasonal sales data to forecast inventory needs, thereby reducing stockouts or overproduction. Methodologies in Market Research Market research methodologies can be broadly categorised into primary and secondary research. Primary Research This involves gathering new data directly from respondents and is tailored to specific organisational needs. It can be qualitative (e.g. interviews, focus groups) or quantitative (e.g. structured surveys, experiments). According to Malhotra et al. (2021), primary research offers high relevance and accuracy but may be time-consuming and costly. For example, a mobile app developer may conduct usability tests and in-app surveys to learn how users interact with the product and identify usability issues. Secondary Research This involves analysing existing data from previously published sources such as government publications, academic journals, or industry databases. While more economical, secondary research may not always fully align with the research problem at hand. Nonetheless, it is often used as a starting point for defining the research scope (Wilson, 2014). For instance, a market entry feasibility study may begin by reviewing demographic data and consumption patterns from national statistics. Surveys Surveys are among the most accessible and scalable tools in market research. They can be administered in multiple formats — online, in-person, by phone, or post — and can include both closed- and open-ended questions. Their primary strength lies in collecting quantitative data about consumer behaviours and preferences (Malhotra et al., 2021). Surveys allow researchers to analyse trends across large groups using statistical tools such as correlation or regression. For example, a product satisfaction survey may reveal a correlation between delivery speed and customer loyalty, guiding logistical improvements. Focus Groups Focus groups are used to explore consumer attitudes, motivations, and beliefs in depth. According to Krueger and Casey (2015), they provide a dynamic environment where participants respond not only to the moderator but to each other’s opinions, leading to richer discussions. This method is particularly valuable in the early stages of product development or brand positioning. For example, a cosmetics company might use focus groups to understand emotional responses to packaging design or to test new advertising messages before launching a campaign. Data Analysis and Interpretation Data collection is only part of the research process. The ability to analyse and interpret data effectively is crucial for turning raw numbers into actionable insights. Techniques such as regression analysis, cluster analysis, and factor analysis help researchers understand relationships between variables and segment customer bases (Hair et al., 2019). Modern market research often employs analytics software like SPSS, SAS, or Tableau. … Read more

Exploring Career Paths with a Business Management Degree

by

A degree in Business Management is one of the most versatile academic qualifications, equipping graduates with the knowledge and skills to thrive in multiple sectors. In a rapidly changing and increasingly competitive global economy, such a degree prepares students to navigate challenges, seize opportunities, and pursue careers ranging from traditional corporate roles to entrepreneurial ventures. This article explores the diverse career paths available, the skills acquired, and the practical applications of a Business Management degree. Career Paths with a Business Management Degree 1.0 Management Consultancy Management consultants assist organisations in solving complex business problems, enhancing efficiency, and implementing strategic change. According to Greiner and Poulfelt (2010), consultancy is a dynamic field requiring strong analytical skills, problem-solving abilities, and the capacity to understand diverse organisational systems. For example, firms such as McKinsey & Company and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) recruit graduates with strong business backgrounds to advise multinational clients on digital transformation, restructuring, or market entry strategies. 2.0 Financial Management A career in financial management focuses on planning, directing, and coordinating investment, banking, and accounting activities. Brigham and Ehrhardt (2013) highlight that financial managers ensure the long-term financial health of organisations by developing investment strategies, creating reports, and managing risk. In practice, companies like HSBC and Barclays employ business graduates in graduate schemes where they work on budgeting, forecasting, and capital allocation, skills that are essential for both private and public organisations. 3.0 Marketing and Sales Management Marketing and sales managers play a vital role in driving brand growth and generating revenue. They develop marketing strategies, identify consumer trends, and design campaigns to enhance brand visibility. Kotler and Keller (2012) emphasise that these roles require creativity, communication, and strategic vision. For instance, Unilever runs graduate programmes where business management graduates help to position global brands such as Dove or Ben & Jerry’s, making decisions on pricing strategies, digital marketing campaigns, and distribution channels. 4.0 Human Resource Management Human Resource (HR) managers oversee the recruitment, retention, and professional development of employees. Armstrong and Taylor (2014) stress that HR professionals must balance organisational needs with employee well-being. Their responsibilities include performance management, employee relations, and ensuring compliance with labour laws. For example, HR roles in firms like PwC or Amazon focus on managing diverse teams, improving workplace culture, and addressing challenges such as remote working and employee engagement. 5.0 Entrepreneurship A Business Management degree is also a launchpad for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs leverage knowledge in finance, operations, and marketing to start and grow ventures. Hisrich, Peters, and Shepherd (2016) argue that entrepreneurship is characterised by innovation, risk-taking, and the ability to recognise opportunities. A clear example is Ben Francis, the founder of Gymshark, who applied business acumen and digital marketing knowledge to grow a billion-pound global fitness brand. Skill Set Acquired 1.0 Analytical Skills Graduates develop strong analytical skills, enabling them to evaluate data, identify business challenges, and propose evidence-based solutions. These skills are crucial in consultancy and finance, where decisions must be backed by data. 2.0 Leadership and Management Skills A significant emphasis of business education is on leadership and management. Yukl (2013) explains that effective leaders must inspire teams, manage projects, and ensure organisational performance. Graduates often practise these skills through group projects, internships, and case studies. 3.0 Financial Acumen Understanding financial principles such as budgeting, cost analysis, and capital investment decisions equips graduates for roles in finance and corporate management. These skills are transferable to multiple sectors, from banking to not-for-profit organisations. 4.0 Communication Skills Communication is central to business. Clampitt (2016) argues that clear and persuasive communication is vital for negotiating deals, motivating employees, and liaising with stakeholders. Business graduates frequently hone these skills through presentations, written reports, and teamwork exercises. 5.0 Strategic Thinking The ability to engage in strategic thinking enables graduates to plan long-term objectives and align resources effectively. Lynch (2015) notes that strategy is fundamental in navigating global competition and technological change. For example, companies like Tesla rely on strategic thinkers to integrate sustainability with competitive positioning. Practical Applications 1.0 Corporate Sector In large corporations, business graduates contribute to specialised departments such as finance, marketing, operations, or HR. For example, graduates at Unilever or Google may work on international projects requiring global business awareness, data analytics, and cultural adaptability. 2.0 Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) SMEs often seek versatile employees capable of handling multiple responsibilities. Business graduates bring a broad understanding of finance, operations, and customer relations, making them invaluable for supporting SME growth. 3.0 Public Sector and Non-profits Graduates also find opportunities in the public sector and non-profit organisations, where strong management skills are needed to oversee budgets, implement policies, and manage change. For example, NGOs such as Oxfam or government departments employ business graduates in roles involving project management and policy implementation. 4.0 International Opportunities Given the global nature of business, many graduates pursue international careers. Multinational companies, such as HSBC or Microsoft, offer graduate schemes abroad, allowing individuals to apply their skills in different cultural and economic contexts. This highlights the transferability of a Business Management degree across borders. A Business Management degree provides access to a diverse range of career paths, from consultancy and finance to HR and entrepreneurship. The skills acquired—including analytical ability, financial literacy, communication, leadership, and strategic thinking—are highly valued across industries. The practical applications of these skills ensure that graduates remain adaptable, employable, and capable of thriving in varied contexts, from corporate boardrooms to entrepreneurial start-ups. As businesses continue to evolve in response to technological, economic, and social changes, the versatility of a Business Management degree ensures its enduring relevance. Graduates not only secure immediate career opportunities but also position themselves for long-term leadership roles and entrepreneurial ventures, making this degree a worthwhile and future-proof investment. References Armstrong, M. & Taylor, S. (2014) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page. Brigham, E.F. & Ehrhardt, M.C. (2013) Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning. Clampitt, P.G. (2016) Communicating for Managerial Effectiveness. SAGE Publications. Greiner, L. & Poulfelt, F. (2010) Management Consulting Today and Tomorrow: Perspectives and Advice … Read more

Innovation vs. Invention: Commercialisation of Innovation

by

In the dynamic world of business and technology, the terms innovation and invention are often used interchangeably, yet they embody distinct and complementary processes. While invention refers to the creation of novel ideas, methods, or products, innovation involves the successful application and commercialisation of these ideas into marketable goods or services. Distinguishing between these concepts is crucial, as their interplay underpins technological progress, business competitiveness, and societal transformation (Fagerberg et al., 2005). Defining Innovation and Commercialisation Innovation is broadly defined as the process of translating an idea or invention into a product, service, or process that creates economic or social value. Schilling (2017) highlights that innovation represents the implementation of new ideas, processes, or technologies to achieve improvements in efficiency, performance, or competitive advantage. Innovation can be categorised into: Incremental innovation: small, continuous improvements, such as regular software updates. Radical innovation: breakthroughs that disrupt industries, such as the emergence of smartphones (Tidd & Bessant, 2020). By contrast, commercialisation refers to the journey of transforming an idea into a market-ready product or service. This process extends from concept development and prototyping to marketing, distribution, and adoption by consumers. Rogers (2003) describes commercialisation as the pivotal stage where technological potential becomes tangible economic value. Without successful commercialisation, even groundbreaking inventions remain dormant. Challenges of Innovation and Commercialisation Despite its importance, commercialising innovation is fraught with challenges. Scholars and practitioners identify several recurring barriers that businesses face: 1.0 Financial Constraints Research and development (R&D), prototyping, and marketing demand substantial resources. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in particular often face capital shortages (Hölzl, 2009). Venture capital or government funding may help bridge gaps, yet uncertainty about returns deters many investors (Dechenaux et al., 2008). For example, many biotech start-ups fail due to the high costs of drug trials before market approval. 2.0 Limited Expertise Commercialisation requires multidisciplinary expertise spanning engineering, market analysis, regulatory compliance, and business strategy (West & Bogers, 2014). Firms lacking such breadth risk market misalignment. For instance, Google Glass was an impressive invention but failed in commercialisation due to poor understanding of consumer needs and privacy concerns (Baycan & Stough, 2013). 3.0 Scaling Issues Even when an innovative product is validated, scaling production and distribution to meet demand can be daunting. Challenges include limited manufacturing capacity, supply chain complexities, and quality control (Nooteboom, 1994). Tesla, for example, struggled with scaling production of its Model 3, highlighting the difficulty of aligning innovation with operational capacity. 4.0 Market Entry Barriers Entering established markets involves overcoming barriers such as customer acquisition, brand trust, and regulatory hurdles (Freeman & Soete, 1997). Larger incumbents can leverage economies of scale and brand loyalty to deter new entrants. In sectors like pharmaceuticals, regulatory approval alone can delay commercialisation for years. Defining Invention and Its Creation Invention is the creation of a novel device, method, or composition that did not previously exist (O’Sullivan & Dooley, 2009). It represents the initial breakthrough that seeds innovation. Inventions may stem from individual creativity, scientific research, or collaborative problem-solving. The invention process typically involves: Idea Generation – novel concepts inspired by curiosity, necessity, or problem-solving (Fagerberg et al., 2005).   Research and Development (R&D) – testing, refinement, and validation to transform abstract ideas into feasible prototypes (Schilling, 2017).   Prototyping and Testing – iterative experimentation to assess functionality and market fit (Tidd & Bessant, 2020).   Intellectual Property Protection – patents and trademarks secure exclusivity, allowing inventors to reap financial benefits and deter imitation (Sichelman, 2009). For instance, the invention of the light bulb by Thomas Edison was only one step; widespread innovation occurred when electricity distribution systems enabled its commercial adoption. The Relationship Between Invention, Innovation, and Commercialisation Although distinct, invention, innovation, and commercialisation form a continuum. Invention is the spark, innovation is the flame, and commercialisation is the fuel that sustains growth (Markman et al., 2009). Without invention, there is no foundation for innovation; without commercialisation, inventions lack societal impact. Examples illustrate this dynamic: The iPhone: Apple did not invent the mobile phone but innovated by integrating touchscreens, app stores, and design, successfully commercialising it into a global product. Bioprinting: While 3D bioprinting is an invention, its commercialisation faces hurdles including regulatory approval, cost, and ethical considerations (Boni, 2018). Strategies for Successful Commercialisation Scholars propose frameworks for overcoming commercialisation barriers: Open Innovation: Collaborating with external stakeholders (universities, customers, suppliers) enhances knowledge and resources (Bogers & West, 2010). For example, Procter & Gamble’s “Connect + Develop” programme harnesses external ideas for product innovation. Intellectual Property Management: Patents and licensing agreements ensure appropriability of returns, crucial for industries with high R&D investment (Nerkar & Shane, 2007). Government and Institutional Support: Public policies, grants, and incubators help mitigate financial and scaling challenges. For instance, the UK’s Innovate UK scheme funds early-stage technology development. Market Orientation: Successful innovations align with consumer needs and preferences. Firms that continuously engage in customer-driven innovation—such as Amazon—enhance adoption rates. Ethical and Social Dimensions of Commercialisation Commercialisation is not purely economic; it has ethical and societal implications. Over-commercialisation of inventions can lead to monopolies, inequality of access, or environmental harm (Di Norcia, 2005). Pharmaceutical patents, for example, create tensions between rewarding inventors and ensuring affordable access to medicines. Similarly, green innovations face pressure to balance profitability with sustainability goals (Datta et al., 2015). The distinction between invention and innovation is fundamental for understanding technological and economic progress. Invention refers to the creative act of producing something new, while innovation represents its successful implementation and commercialisation in markets. The commercialisation journey, however, is fraught with barriers including financial constraints, expertise limitations, scaling difficulties, and market entry challenges. Firms that succeed often combine intellectual property protection, open innovation strategies, strong market orientation, and external support systems. Ultimately, commercialisation determines whether inventions remain ideas in laboratories or evolve into transformative innovations shaping societies and industries. References Baycan, T. & Stough, R. (2013). Bridging knowledge to commercialisation: the good, the bad, and the challenging. Annals of Regional Science, 50(2), pp.367–405. Bogers, M. & West, J. (2010). Contrasting innovation creation and commercialisation within open, … Read more

Size and Scope of Organisations: Differences and Dynamics

by

Organisations vary substantially in their size and scope, each shaping their objectives, market share, growth strategies, and sustainability. The size of an organisation determines its access to resources, capital, and technological capability, while its scope defines the geographical and industrial breadth of its operations. Understanding the differences and dynamics between large, medium-sized, and small organisations—and how they interact within national and global contexts—is crucial to analysing modern business ecosystems. As Kotler (2017) notes, organisational scale often correlates with strategic reach and market influence, thereby influencing competitiveness and long-term viability. 1.0 Size of Organisations: Large, Medium-Sized, and Small Organisations Large organisations, such as multinational corporations (MNCs), command significant market power, often characterised by high levels of capitalisation, diversified product portfolios, and global supply chains. They pursue economies of scale, allowing them to produce goods or services at lower per-unit costs (Porter, 1980). For instance, Toyota and Apple operate across continents, leveraging extensive research and development (R&D) budgets and brand equity to dominate their industries. According to Kotler (2017), large organisations possess the ability to influence consumer trends and industry standards through their extensive market presence. These corporations typically adopt hierarchical structures to manage complex operations and ensure standardisation across global divisions. Medium-sized organisations, while not possessing the same reach as MNCs, play a critical role in regional economic stability and sectoral innovation. Burns (2016) explains that such firms balance growth ambitions with risk management, often operating within specific industries or geographic markets. Their primary objectives are sustainable growth, competitive differentiation, and financial stability. Examples include regional banks or national retail chains such as John Lewis Partnership in the United Kingdom, which combine strong brand loyalty with efficient management. Unlike larger corporations, medium-sized firms often enjoy greater managerial flexibility and adaptability, enabling quicker responses to market fluctuations. Small organisations, including start-ups, micro-enterprises, and family-owned businesses, typically operate within niche markets and emphasise innovation and personalised services (Scarborough, 2015). Their survival often depends on entrepreneurial orientation, local market knowledge, and customer intimacy. However, they face challenges such as limited access to finance, market visibility, and economies of scale. The success of small technology firms like Revolut and Monzo in the financial technology sector exemplifies how agility and innovation can offset scale disadvantages. According to Mankiw (2018), smaller enterprises contribute significantly to employment generation and economic diversity, serving as vital drivers of local and regional development. 2.0 Scope of Organisations 2.1 Transnational, International, and Global Organisations The increasing globalisation of business has reshaped organisational structures, giving rise to transnational, international, and global enterprises. Each model represents a distinct approach to managing cross-border operations and strategic integration. International organisations typically expand from a domestic base into foreign markets by replicating existing business models with minimal adaptation. This approach, often termed ethnocentric management, focuses on transferring home-country practices abroad (Bartlett & Beamish, 2018). Examples include traditional manufacturing firms that establish foreign subsidiaries primarily for sales and distribution. Transnational organisations, on the other hand, strive to balance global efficiency with local responsiveness (Bartlett & Beamish, 2018). They integrate resources and knowledge from multiple markets to create a globally networked structure. Companies like Unilever and Nestlé epitomise this model, adapting products and marketing strategies to local preferences while maintaining overall strategic coherence. According to Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson (2017), this hybrid strategy allows transnational firms to achieve both cost competitiveness and cultural adaptability. In contrast, global organisations operate with a standardised global strategy and a unified brand identity. Their goal is to achieve economies of scale, brand consistency, and operational efficiency worldwide. Examples include Google, Coca-Cola, and McDonald’s, which use a common global brand while leveraging data analytics and technological integration to coordinate operations across continents. However, global firms must navigate regulatory diversity, cultural variations, and geopolitical risks, which can affect performance and reputation. As Clarkson (1995) emphasises through the stakeholder theory, global corporations must balance the expectations of diverse stakeholder groups, including governments, customers, employees, and local communities. 2.2 Franchising, Joint Ventures, and Licensing Organisations often expand their scope of operations through strategic partnerships, such as franchising, joint ventures, and licensing. Each model presents unique benefits and challenges depending on the firm’s resources, risk appetite, and market objectives. Franchising allows a company (the franchisor) to grant rights to another entity (the franchisee) to operate under its brand name and business model. This structure enables rapid market expansion with limited financial investment from the franchisor (Justis & Judd, 2003). Prominent examples include McDonald’s and Subway, which rely heavily on franchise networks for global growth. Franchising ensures brand consistency and quality control, while allowing entrepreneurial ownership at the local level. However, it can lead to conflicts over operational standards and revenue sharing if not properly managed. Joint ventures (JVs) involve the creation of a new entity jointly owned by two or more organisations to achieve shared objectives. They are often used for market entry, resource sharing, and technological collaboration. For instance, Sony Ericsson was a joint venture between Sony (Japan) and Ericsson (Sweden), combining expertise in electronics and telecommunications (Geringer, 1991). JVs enable companies to share risks, costs, and knowledge, though they also require strong governance and aligned strategic goals to avoid conflict. Licensing allows one company (the licensor) to permit another (the licensee) to use its intellectual property (IP), such as patents, trademarks, or technology, in exchange for royalties or fees. Licensing is a common approach in pharmaceutical and technology sectors, enabling firms to monetise innovations without directly managing production (Kim & Vonortas, 2014). For example, pharmaceutical giants such as Pfizer license drug manufacturing rights to regional firms to expand global reach while maintaining IP protection. Licensing provides a low-risk expansion route, but licensors may face challenges in quality control and brand integrity across markets. 3.0 Dynamics of Size and Scope in Organisational Sustainability The interaction between size and scope plays a critical role in determining organisational sustainability and strategic resilience. According to Freeman (1984) and Donaldson and Preston (1995), organisations operate within complex stakeholder networks, where strategic decisions must balance economic, social, and environmental responsibilities. Large … Read more

Different Types of Organisations: Structures, Purposes and Legal Frameworks

by

Organisations play a pivotal role in shaping the economic and social fabric of any society. They exist in a variety of forms, each defined by distinct purposes, objectives, and legal structures. From for‑profit businesses driving market competition to not‑for‑profit bodies serving community needs, and from micro‑scale enterprises to large, complex companies, understanding these organisational differences is essential for entrepreneurs, policymakers and the general public alike. This article explores the differences between for‑profit and not‑for‑profit organisations, including non‑governmental organisations (NGOs), the characteristics of micro, small, and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs), and the range of legal structures such as sole traders, partnerships, and limited companies. 1.0 For‑Profit vs. Not‑For‑Profit and NGOs 1.1 For‑Profit Organisations For‑profit organisations operate with the primary aim of generating profit for owners or shareholders. These range from local family businesses to multinational corporations and may operate in diverse industries. Profits may be reinvested into the business or distributed to shareholders as dividends. Their key objectives often include maximising shareholder value, expanding market share, and ensuring sustainable growth (Bragg, 2011). In a competitive economy, such organisations are central to innovation, employment creation, and wealth generation. 1.2 Not‑For‑Profit Organisations In contrast, not‑for‑profit organisations are formed to serve a public or community benefit, rather than to generate profits for distribution. Any surplus revenue is reinvested into achieving the organisation’s mission. Examples include charities, educational institutions, and cultural organisations. Their aims are often focused on social improvement, education, or cultural preservation rather than financial gain (Anheier, 2014). While financial sustainability remains important, success is measured primarily in terms of mission impact rather than profit margins. 1.3 Non‑Governmental Organisations (NGOs) NGOs are a specific type of not‑for‑profit organisation that operates independently of government control. They typically address social, environmental, and humanitarian issues and often work internationally. Funding is derived from donations, grants, and volunteer contributions. NGOs play a critical role in advocacy, service provision, and community development (Werker & Ahmed, 2008). Maintaining public trust through transparency and accountability is vital to their continued effectiveness. 2.0 Micro, Small, and Medium‑Sized Enterprises (SMEs) SMEs are a major driver of economic development, contributing significantly to employment, innovation, and GDP. They are categorised primarily by employee numbers, annual turnover, and economic impact. 2.1 Micro Enterprises Micro enterprises are very small‑scale businesses, typically employing fewer than 10 people and requiring low levels of capital investment. They often serve local markets, providing essential goods or services such as small shops, trades, or home‑based businesses. Their primary goals are survival, self‑employment, and supporting the local community (Berger & Udell, 2006). 2.2 Small Enterprises Small enterprises operate on a slightly larger scale, with more employees and higher turnover than micro enterprises. They may focus on niche markets and often seek to grow market share and increase profitability. Many small enterprises begin to explore limited export activities as they expand. 2.3 Medium‑Sized Enterprises Medium‑sized enterprises have more formalised structures, often operate in multiple markets, and generate significant revenue. They aim to scale operations, diversify products, and compete internationally. Collectively, SMEs are vital in balancing economic stability and innovation (Beck, Demirguc‑Kunt & Levine, 2005). 3.0 Employee numbers for micro, small, medium, and large organisations [European Commission (2003); BEIS (2021)] Organisation Size Number of Employees Notes Micro Fewer than 10 Usually small, local operations with low turnover. Often owner‑managed. Small 10–49 More structured than micro‑enterprises, may employ specialist staff. Medium 50–249 Formal organisational structures, often regional or national reach. Large 250 or more Complex management systems, national or international operations. 4.0 Legal Structures of Businesses The legal structure of a business determines its ownership arrangements, liability, tax obligations, and management framework. 4.1 Sole Traders A sole trader is an individual who owns and operates the business alone. This is the simplest and most cost‑effective business form to establish. The owner has full control over decision‑making but also bears unlimited liability—meaning personal assets are at risk if the business incurs debts (Bainbridge, 2012). Sole traders are common in small service industries such as trades, creative work, and consultancy. 4.2 Partnerships A partnership involves two or more individuals sharing business ownership. They benefit from combined resources and skills, but also face joint liability for debts. Partnerships can be general partnerships, where all partners share equal responsibility, or limited partnerships, where some partners have restricted liability and involvement. Partnerships are common in professional services such as law, accountancy, and medical practices. 4.3 Limited Companies A limited company is a separate legal entity from its owners. This structure offers limited liability protection, safeguarding owners’ personal assets from company debts. Private limited companies (Ltd) restrict share transfers, whereas public limited companies (PLC) can sell shares to the public (Davies, 2010). While offering protection, limited companies face stricter regulations, corporate governance requirements, and more complex reporting obligations. 5.0 Choosing the Right Structure and Type Understanding the type and legal structure of an organisation is critical for strategic decision‑making. A start‑up entrepreneur may prefer a sole trader model for simplicity, while a growing firm might convert into a limited company to limit liability and attract investment. Similarly, community‑driven initiatives might opt for not‑for‑profit status to align with their mission and secure charitable funding. 6.0 The Bigger Picture The differences between for‑profit and not‑for‑profit organisations, and between micro, small, and medium‑sized enterprises, go beyond size and purpose—they influence governance, funding, and operational priorities. For‑profit companies thrive on market competition and return on investment, while not‑for‑profits and NGOs measure success by social and community outcomes. Legal structures further shape how these organisations operate. Sole traders enjoy independence but carry risk, partnerships enable collaboration but require trust and shared liability, and limited companies offer protection but bring regulatory complexity. In practice, these organisational forms are interconnected. Large companies may collaborate with NGOs on corporate social responsibility projects; SMEs may partner with community groups; and not‑for‑profits often operate with business‑like efficiency to maximise their impact. The variety of organisational types reflects the diversity of economic and social needs in modern society. For‑profit businesses power economic growth, not‑for‑profits address social priorities, and NGOs act as advocates … Read more

Characteristics of Average and Great Employees

by

In the contemporary workplace, employees can broadly be classified into two categories: average employees and great employees. This distinction is critical for organisational success, as the collective performance of individuals directly influences productivity, innovation, and workplace culture. Recognising and understanding the attributes that separate great employees from their average counterparts enables organisations to design effective talent management strategies, build high-performance teams, and foster an environment where excellence thrives. This article explores the key characteristics of average versus great employees, examining their behaviours, motivations, and contributions. It also highlights how organisations can cultivate a culture that nurtures greatness among employees. 1.0 Average Employees Average employees typically do what is required of them but rarely go beyond expectations. Their attitudes and behaviours often reveal patterns that undermine both individual growth and collective performance. 1.1 Lack of Motivation and Engagement Average employees often come to work primarily for the paycheque, with their motivation being largely extrinsic. They lack the intrinsic drive to excel and may show minimal curiosity or interest in learning new skills. According to Deci and Ryan’s (1985) Self-Determination Theory, intrinsic motivation—engaging in work out of genuine interest and satisfaction—leads to superior outcomes compared to extrinsic motivation. Employees who lack this intrinsic motivation risk stagnating, both personally and professionally. 1.2 Resistance to Change Change is an unavoidable reality in the modern workplace. However, average employees tend to resist change, clinging to the comfort of established routines. This rigidity can stifle innovation and hinder organisational adaptability. Kotter (1996) argues that resistance to change is a major barrier to organisational transformation, often causing delays in implementation and creating inefficiencies. 1.3 Poor Planning and Health Habits Average employees frequently struggle with time management and planning, leading to inefficiencies, missed deadlines, and reduced productivity. Their approach to tasks is often reactive rather than proactive. In addition, poor health habits such as lack of exercise, poor diet, or inadequate sleep may contribute to absenteeism, reduced energy, and lower resilience. Cooper, Dewe and O’Driscoll (2001) highlight how stress and poor health behaviours negatively impact both productivity and overall organisational performance. 1.4 Blame Culture and Fear-Based Motivation When mistakes occur, average employees often resort to blame-shifting rather than taking responsibility. This behaviour fosters a toxic work environment where accountability is lacking. Kane-Urrabazo (2006) emphasises that fear-based motivation, where employees act out of anxiety rather than ambition, erodes trust and stifles collaboration. Such cultures prevent individuals from learning from mistakes and adapting effectively. 1.5 Lack of Contribution and Team Spirit Average employees tend to contribute only the minimum required, showing limited initiative. They rarely offer new ideas or challenge existing processes. Furthermore, their lack of enthusiasm can dampen team morale. Edmondson (1999) introduced the concept of psychological safety, arguing that teams thrive when individuals feel safe to contribute ideas and take risks. Average employees, however, often avoid contributing meaningfully, thereby weakening team dynamics. 2.0 Great Employees Great employees distinguish themselves through their mindset, behaviours, and impact. They bring energy, innovation, and accountability to their roles, elevating not only their own performance but also that of those around them. 2.1 Passion for Work and Continuous Learning Great employees are driven by intrinsic motivation. They take pride in their work and strive for excellence beyond external rewards. They actively pursue continuous learning, acquiring new skills to remain relevant in a rapidly changing environment. According to Kolb’s (1984) Experiential Learning Theory, individuals who embrace learning cycles—through reflection, conceptualisation, and experimentation—are better equipped to adapt and innovate. 2.2 Embracing Change Unlike their average counterparts, great employees view change as an opportunity rather than a threat. Their adaptability enables organisations to transition smoothly during restructuring, technological advancements, or shifts in market demands. Heifetz, Grashow and Linsky (2009) describe adaptability as a hallmark of effective leadership, with employees who embrace change contributing significantly to long-term resilience. 2.3 Strategic Planning and Health Consciousness Great employees demonstrate strong self-management skills, including planning, prioritisation, and goal-setting. They work systematically and set ambitious yet achievable objectives. Moreover, they understand the link between physical well-being and productivity. Maintaining healthy habits enables them to sustain high levels of energy and focus. Cameron and Quinn (2011) emphasise the importance of personal discipline and resilience in fostering a high-performance culture. 2.4 Responsibility and Excellence Accountability is a defining trait of great employees. They readily take ownership of their actions, learning from setbacks rather than deflecting blame. This proactive approach fosters a culture of excellence. Covey (1989) argues that individuals who embrace responsibility are better positioned to achieve lasting success, as they focus on solutions rather than excuses. 2.5 Contribution and Leadership Great employees are often the innovators within teams, consistently contributing fresh ideas and process improvements. They are proactive problem-solvers who dislike inefficiency. Their ability to inspire and motivate peers often positions them as informal leaders, regardless of their job title. Senge (1990) notes that organisations thrive when individuals contribute to the collective learning process, a trait commonly embodied by great employees. Their positive attitude and collaborative spirit enhance team cohesion and workplace culture. 3.0 Cultivating Great Employees While some traits of great employees may be innate, organisations play a crucial role in nurturing and developing greatness. 3.1 Building a Learning Culture Organisations should encourage continuous learning and development. By investing in training programmes, mentorship opportunities, and career development initiatives, employers can transform average performers into great employees. Garavan et al. (2021) highlight that a culture of learning enhances both engagement and performance. 3.2 Promoting Psychological Safety Encouraging employees to share ideas without fear of ridicule fosters innovation and collaboration. Edmondson (1999) emphasises that creating a climate of psychological safety allows employees to take risks, challenge the status quo, and grow. 3.3 Rewarding Initiative and Innovation Recognising and rewarding employees who go beyond basic expectations reinforces desirable behaviours. Recognition programmes that value not only performance outcomes but also creativity, teamwork, and accountability are particularly effective (Armstrong and Taylor, 2020). 3.4 Leadership and Role Modelling Managers and leaders must act as role models, demonstrating the traits of great employees—passion, adaptability, and accountability. Employees … Read more

About Us
Legal & Compliance